Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4272
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4272
23 Jul 2026
 | 23 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Stratification-induced hypoxia shapes greenhouse gas dynamics in ponds

Chiara Esposito, Joachim Audet, Eti Ester Levi, and Thomas Alexander Davidson

Abstract. Fresh waters in general and ponds in particular are biogeochemical hot spots and as such are sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2). Several studies have shown that thermal stratification of the water column is a common characteristic of ponds, but how this process influences GHG dynamics is less well studied. We tracked thermal stratification and the associated hypoxia in six ponds across the growing season and measured dissolved CH4 and CO2 in surface and bottom waters, along with CH4 ebullition, every two weeks. The results showed that all ponds stratified during the growing season and that thermal stratification often, but not always, led to bottom-water hypoxia. Where hypoxia occurred, bottom-water CH4 was approximately 16 times higher (median 3.05 vs 0.19 mg C L−1), CO2 about 3 times higher (11.6 vs 4.03 mg C L−1) and CH4 ebullition was about 3.4 times higher than in oxic conditions. In contrast, surface-water GHG concentrations showed no significant difference between periods with and without bottom-water hypoxia. Bottom-water temperatures were not significantly different between hypoxic and oxic states, indicating oxygen availability, rather than temperature, dominated GHG buildup and ebullition. Stratification and the resulting hypoxia enhance CH4 ebullition and promote high concentrations of GHGs in bottom waters, which may be released in small or larger pulses as the water column mixes partially or fully. In summary this study demonstrates that thermal stratification, by inducing bottom-water hypoxia, strongly influences the GHG dynamics across a range of timescales in ponds.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Chiara Esposito, Joachim Audet, Eti Ester Levi, and Thomas Alexander Davidson

Status: open (until 03 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Chiara Esposito, Joachim Audet, Eti Ester Levi, and Thomas Alexander Davidson
Chiara Esposito, Joachim Audet, Eti Ester Levi, and Thomas Alexander Davidson
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Small ponds release greenhouse gases, but the exact dynamics behind this remain unclear. We found that when the ponds bottom-waters lose oxygen, methane rises sixteen-fold and carbon dioxide triples. When weather changes mix the pond, these trapped gases can escape into the air in sudden, massive bursts. This proves small ponds release intense pulses of warming gases, meaning they may play a much larger role in driving global climate change than previously recognized.
Share