the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Intense concentric gravity waves from the stratosphere to the thermosphere and a massive red sprite outbreak triggered by severe thunderstorms South of the Himalayas
Abstract. Severe thunderstorms drive vertical coupling through electrical processes associated with transient luminous events (TLEs) and dynamical processes associated with atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs). On 19 May 2022, an exceptionally intense thunderstorm outbreak occurred over the northern Bay of Bengal–Himalayan foothill region. The storm system produced more than 100 red sprites, 16 secondary gigantic jets, and at least four ghosts, accompanied by visible concentric airglow ripples. This event represented the first large-scale detection of a massive red sprite outbreak in China. From a dynamical perspective, concentric gravity waves (CGWs) were observed from the stratosphere to the thermosphere using coordinated satellite and ground-based airglow observations. AIRS measurements revealed concentric wave structures in the stratosphere above the convective source region, while ground-based airglow imagers detected CGWs in the OH, OI 557.7 nm, and OI 630.0 nm emission layers. CGWs in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) propagated northeastward for more than 3000 km, suggesting propagation within favorable MLT ducting structures. In contrast, thermospheric CGWs observed in the OI 630.0 nm emission exhibited horizontal phase speeds of 260–280 m s⁻¹. Reverse ray-tracing analysis indicates a preferred source altitude near 150 km, suggesting that these waves were likely secondary gravity waves generated by the dissipation and breaking of upward-propagating primary gravity waves. Their asymmetric occurrence is likely attributable to Doppler-induced dissipation associated with thermospheric background winds. These observations provide a rare example of simultaneous electrical and dynamical coupling from the troposphere to the thermosphere during an extreme convective event.
- Preprint
(3768 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 21 Oct 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4160', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Aug 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-4160/egusphere-2026-4160-RC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-4160-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', QINZENG LI, 07 Oct 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-4160/egusphere-2026-4160-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', QINZENG LI, 07 Oct 2026
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-4160', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Oct 2026
reply
General Comments
This manuscript presents a rare and valuable case study of an extreme convective outbreak south of the Himalayas on 19 May 2022, during which both a massive TLE outbreak and multi-layer concentric gravity waves were observed. The combination of amateur photography, ground-based airglow imaging, satellite observations, and model results provides a strong basis for studying vertical atmospheric coupling from the lower atmosphere to the thermosphere and offers a valuable test case for understanding how extreme convection drives multi-layer electrical and dynamical coupling.
The study is generally well organized, and the scientific storyline is clear. The observations of long-distance MLT CGW propagation and thermospheric CGWs are particularly interesting. The interpretation that the thermospheric waves are likely secondary gravity waves is plausible, and the proposed role of background winds in controlling their asymmetric observability is physically reasonable.
The manuscript is suitable for publication after the authors clarify several methodological details and improve the presentation. In particular, the authors should better explain the uncertainty of the ray-tracing results, the criteria used to identify MLT ducting, and the evidence linking the multi-station OH wave observations to the same CGW system. I recommend minor revision.
Overall, this is a scientifically interesting contribution with a valuable multi-instrument dataset. The required revisions are mainly related to clarity, reproducibility, and wording rather than the main conclusions.
Specific Comments
- The phrases “first large-scale detection” and “largest documented sprite outbreak observed from China” should be made consistent.
- Please provide uncertainties for the 260–280 m s⁻¹ phase speeds or describe the main error sources.
- The inferred source altitude near 150 km should be accompanied by an uncertainty range or a brief explanation of ray-tracing sensitivity.
- Please explain more clearly why the OH wave packets observed at Lhasa, Xining, and Xinglong are identified as the same wave system.
- The ducting analysis should clearly state the criterion used for identifying ducting layers and whether the background wind is projected along the propagation direction.
- The physical meaning of Fig. 13 should be explained more clearly, especially why the hatched regions imply that gravity waves cannot continue vertical propagation.
- Please provide more details on the reverse ray-tracing method, including initial conditions, background fields, integration settings, and stopping criteria.
- The word “simultaneous” should be used carefully, since AIRS, TLE, and airglow observations occur at different times during the event.
Technical Corrections
- Line 120: change “between ~50 and500 km” to “between ~50 and 500 km”.
- Fig. 4 caption: “Aqua/ARIS” should be “Aqua/AIRS”.
- Fig. 7 caption: “CGWS” should be “CGWs”.
- Fig. 11 caption: “TIEGCM” should be “TIE-GCM”.
- Section 3.5.2: “themosphere” should be “thermosphere”.
- “Prandtlnumber” should be “Prandtl number”.
- Remove the extra space in “https://user.eumetsat.int /data-access/eumetview”.
- Please verify the year of Schmetz et al.; it appears inconsistent.
- Line 433: "ρ were" should be "ρ was".
- Check DOI formatting throughout the reference list.
- Figure captions should be made fully self-contained, including time, altitude, station, and symbol/color meanings where applicable.
- Please carefully verify that the in-text citations are consistent with the reference list.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', QINZENG LI, 07 Oct 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-4160/egusphere-2026-4160-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
RC3: 'Reply on AC2', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Oct 2026
reply
The authors have made all changes that I suggested, I think the paper should be accepted
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4160-RC3
-
RC3: 'Reply on AC2', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Oct 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 217 | 115 | 44 | 376 | 33 | 29 |
- HTML: 217
- PDF: 115
- XML: 44
- Total: 376
- BibTeX: 33
- EndNote: 29
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1