Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4140
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4140
31 Jul 2026
 | 31 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).

Boreal autumn to winter North Atlantic atmosphere-ocean coupling in large ensemble climate simulations

Yvonne Anderson, Amanda C. Maycock, Juliane Schwendike, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Simon A. Josey, and Doug M. Smith

Abstract. Recent studies have suggested an observed causal relationship between autumn North Atlantic sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies and the phase of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). This autumn SST-winter NAO link, which is mediated by turbulent heat fluxes (THF) and baroclinicity, appears to be underestimated in seasonal prediction models, suggesting possible model limitations in representing air-sea coupling. However, strong atmospheric driving of North Atlantic THF and SST variability at seasonal timescales presents a challenge in establishing a causal ocean feedback onto the large-scale atmosphere. This study examines the representation of autumn-winter North Atlantic atmosphere-ocean variability in ERA5 reanalysis data and historical large ensembles from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Models adequately capture concurrent North Atlantic atmosphere-SST variability within the autumn and winter seasons, when THF and SST tendencies are mainly atmosphere-driven. However, the leading mode of covariance between autumn SST–winter mean sea level pressure (MSLP) in models differs from ERA5. In ERA5, warm SST anomalies in the central North Atlantic in autumn precede a positive winter NAO anomaly. Conversely, the CMIP6 models show, on average, weak cool autumn SST anomalies precede a positive winter NAO with large model spread. Using an atmospheric analogue method, we separate atmosphere- and ocean-driven components of autumn THF variability and assess their respective relationships with winter MSLP variability. In ERA5, the winter MSLP signal associated with ocean-driven autumn THF anomalies is near zero; in contrast, the winter NAO is linked to atmosphere-driven autumn THF variability. This suggests that atmospheric processes, such as tropical-extratropical teleconnections, could explain the autumn THF–winter MSLP relationship in ERA5 described in a previous study, or that SST anomalies arising from autumn atmospheric forcing persist into winter and contribute to a lagged feedback on the atmosphere. CMIP6 models generally underestimate the winter NAO signal associated with atmosphere-driven autumn THF anomalies, which could reflect biases in feedbacks, atmospheric teleconnections or underpersistence of inter-seasonal North Atlantic SST anomalies.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Weather and Climate Dynamics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Yvonne Anderson, Amanda C. Maycock, Juliane Schwendike, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Simon A. Josey, and Doug M. Smith

Status: open (until 11 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Yvonne Anderson, Amanda C. Maycock, Juliane Schwendike, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Simon A. Josey, and Doug M. Smith
Yvonne Anderson, Amanda C. Maycock, Juliane Schwendike, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Simon A. Josey, and Doug M. Smith
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 31 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
This study assessed how well climate models represent relationships between the North Atlantic ocean and atmosphere in autumn and winter. While models simulate observed relationships in autumn and winter, they fail to capture them in the transition between seasons. The results suggest the link between autumn sea surface temperatures and the winter atmosphere is driven mainly by atmospheric rather than ocean processes, highlighting important model biases that may limit seasonal forecast skill.
Share