Part II: An initial evaluation of the QuSI-DEM Discrete Element model using idealized and realistic test cases for sea ice
Abstract. Sea ice is a quasi-brittle material that cracks, deforms, and flows under the load of wind and ocean currents. In part I we introduced QuSI-DEM, a model designed to capture crack patterns that develop as a result of sea ice fracture that depend critically on the elastic and dissipative response of the material at the location of failure. Parameters were introduced to the contact physics in QuSI-DEM to provide control of the failure rate and timing of transitions in contact response and to constrain the amount of energy and momentum transfer as elements interact. The sensitivity of the model response to these parameters is first demonstrated here in a set of idealized experiments involving the interactions of a few elements. The model is then applied to realistic simulations of sea ice response to northerly wind stress in the southern Chukchi Sea and Bering Strait. Here again, the parameter space is explored along with sensitivity to element size and arrangement through sets of ensemble simulations to explore the phenomenology of ice arching. Post-failure parameters such as the strength of the sea ice at the transition from bonded to frictional sliding, and the residual sea ice strength for heavily impacted ice are found to significantly impact model response.
Overview:
Durski at al. present a detailed verification and validation of their DEM sea ice model, presented in part II. The authors are to be commended for the detail they go to to verify and validate the model. The results on ice arching were particularly interesting and we eagerly await further simulations with this model. I don't have many more comments for this paper since the model description was all in part I and the test cases presented here we all fine. As mentioned in the review of part I, its unclear why the paper is split into two parts, neither by themselves is a full journal article.
Comments:
The paper title should follow the format of part I take the form of something like "QuSI-DEM version 1.0: A polygon ... coordinates: Part II: An initial evaluation using idealized and realistic test cases"
Minor corrections:
The paper is generally inconsistent with bolding subfigure letters
Closing single quotes are used throughout instead of opening single quotes at the start of quotes e.g. l429
l108: Missing space after "magnitude"
l139: Extra "parameter"?
l162: " ," -> ", "
l173: Extra space before "-"
l323: extra "."
l326: "( 9b)" -> "(9b)"
l391: "-1" should be superscript.
l602: Don't start a sentence with "But"
Fig 2 caption: "Line color" -> "line color"
Fig 5 caption: Missing period before "c"
Fig 6/7 caption: "simulations d Displays" -> "simulations. d displays"
Fig 15 caption: add space between "length," and "(c)"Â
Fig 17 caption: Missing spaces. Also why ate the subplot letters bold here and not in other places?