Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4028
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4028
17 Aug 2026
 | 17 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems (GI).

Bias corrections and prediction intervals for time-series measurements with fouling and calibration drift

Timothy O. Hodson and Gregory E. Schwarz

Abstract. Environmental time-series measurements are subject to systematic errors from fouling and calibration drift, requiring operators to routinely check, clean, and recalibrate their sensors. Information from these checks can then be used to estimate bias corrections and prediction intervals for the measurements. If the checks are exact, the corrections and intervals have direct solutions. More realistically, the checks are noisy, and the error state is estimated with a Kalman smoother. Check information can also be pooled across sensors in a monitoring network to improve estimates for newly deployed sensors. The method relies on checks that operators already perform, and its computation and storage demands are modest, so it integrates readily into existing monitoring programs.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Timothy O. Hodson and Gregory E. Schwarz

Status: open (until 22 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Timothy O. Hodson and Gregory E. Schwarz
Timothy O. Hodson and Gregory E. Schwarz
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 17 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Environmental sensors gradually develop errors during the course of a deployment. Operators routinely check, clean, and recalibrate each sensor, but current practice treats the checks as error-free and reports no uncertainty for the corrected data. We present a statistical method that quantifies uncertainty in both the checks and the corrections, combines information across a sensor network to improve estimates for new sensors, and is efficient enough for routine use.
Share