Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3781
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3781
07 Jul 2026
 | 07 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Differentiable Hybrid Hydrological Model for Short-Term Flood Forecasting with Future Meteorological Information

Leijing Li, Liutianjiao Hong, Jianzhu Li, Peng Shi, Shuaihang Wang, and Jiyang Tian

Abstract. Short-term flood forecasting is essential for flood control operation and risk warning in small- and medium-sized basins, yet its accuracy is constrained by rainfall uncertainty, hydrological model structural limitations, and watershed physical response characteristics. To address these challenges, this study developed a differentiable hybrid hydrological forecasting framework that coupled future meteorological information with physically representations of runoff generation, baseflow recession, flow concentration, and channel routing. A physics-informed neural architecture search (PINAS) routing scheme was further proposed and systematically compared with differentiable Muskingum routing and convolutional unit-hydrograph routing, while a purely data-driven LSTM model was used as the benchmark. The framework was evaluated in three representative watersheds in Hebei Province, China, namely the Shahe basin (2210 km2), Jumahe basin (1760 km2), and Liulin basin (57.4 km2), using rainfall–runoff observations from the flood seasons of 2000–2023 and radar-echo data from 2018–2023. Multi-lead flood forecasting experiments were conducted for lead times of 0.5–2.0 h. The results showed that the LSTM benchmark achieves high numerical accuracy in some high-peak flood events, but lacks explicit physical constraints. In contrast, the model with PINAS routing exhibited the most stable overall performance among the hybrid hydrological models, achieving a more balanced representation of flood-peak propagation, hydrograph smoothing, and recession preservation. The data-dependency analysis indicated that increasing the amount of training data improved forecasting stability, but model skill does not increase strictly monotonically with sample size, sample representativeness and flood-type coverage were also critical. SHAP interpretability analysis further revealed that forecasts in the Shahe and Jumahe basins were mainly controlled by radar echoes and their extrapolated features, whereas the small Liulin Basin was more strongly influenced by measured areal rainfall and gauge rainfall. These findings demonstrated that integrating physical constraints, differentiable runoff–routing structures, and future meteorological information can improve the stability, physical consistency, and hydrological interpretability of short-term flood forecasting in small- and medium-sized basins.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Leijing Li, Liutianjiao Hong, Jianzhu Li, Peng Shi, Shuaihang Wang, and Jiyang Tian

Status: open (until 18 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Leijing Li, Liutianjiao Hong, Jianzhu Li, Peng Shi, Shuaihang Wang, and Jiyang Tian
Leijing Li, Liutianjiao Hong, Jianzhu Li, Peng Shi, Shuaihang Wang, and Jiyang Tian
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 07 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
1. PINAS used a physically constrained searchable routing structure to more flexibly represent basin-scale differences and flood-wave propagation characteristics. 2. The size of the training sample had a significant impact on the performance of PINAS. However, the improvement was not entirely a monotonic trend. 3. SHAP interpretability analysis revealed significant differences in the main sources of information among different basins.
Share