Microstructural Heterogeneity Drives Tracer-Specific Systematic Bias in Darcy-Scale Flux Estimation
Abstract. Complex microstructures are commonly simplified to a single continuum for interpreting Darcy-scale heat and solute transport, and tracers are often treated as interchangeable proxies for flux estimation. However, the specific impacts of microstructural heterogeneity on tracer-specific bias regimes remain poorly understood. We conducted controlled laboratory solute and heat tracer experiments using four sands with distinct grain size distributions, combined with micro-CT imaging and topological analysis of a controlled endmember pair. Although Darcy-scale analytical models reproduced observed breakthrough curves with excellent fidelity (mean R² > 0.99, NRMSE < 0.037), tracer-derived fluxes systematically underestimated independently measured Darcy fluxes in a tracer-specific manner. Solute fluxes were linearly underestimated by ~25 % in the more heterogeneous sands, correlating with right-skewed pore-size distributions (skewness = 0.781) and non-Gaussian breakthrough behavior. In contrast, heat fluxes were nonlinearly and velocity-dependently underestimated, reaching up to 45 % (including 19 % spatial variability in volumetric heat capacity) in the most heterogeneous medium, with the solute-to-heat divergence ratio increasing with flow velocity. Micro-CT analysis revealed that the sand mixture possessed a more negative Euler number (−9,210 vs. −6,288) and exhibited representative elementary volume instability, indicating that tortuous pore connectivity amplifies local thermal non-equilibrium under fast flow. Conventional geostatistical metrics (e.g., Matérn smoothness) failed to distinguish these structural differences. These findings demonstrate that microstructural heterogeneity imposes physics-dependent, systematic biases that are invisible to standard continuum models and geostatistical descriptors, and that heat tracers become less reliable than solute tracers under high-velocity heterogeneous conditions. Process-aware metrics linking pore-network topology to transport behavior are needed to resolve these upscaling failures.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
General comments
Very good research on the parallel between solute and heat transport in geological porous media. You can follow my suggestions to improve your manuscript.
Specific comments
Lines 30-76. The discussion is not very long. You can better highlight your novelties in contaminant hydrology, as well as in geothermal energy research.
Lines 30-31. You can insert recent reviews that combine discussion on solute, and heat transport:
- Kurylyk, B.L., Irvine, D.J., Bense, V.F., 2019. Theory, tools, and multidisciplinary applications for tracing groundwater fluxes from temperature profiles. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 6(1), p.e1329.
- Lupi, F., Agbotui, P. Y., Medici, G. 2026. Hydraulic Conductivity in the Mesozoic units of the Umbria-Marche succession (Italy); insights towards a sustainable management of carbonate aquifers worldwide. Sustainability, 18, 9297; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18189297.
Line 38. “Small-scale heterogeneities”. How small? Can you disclose a range?
Line 38. “Small-scale heterogeneities”. Think about introducing sedimentological terms if you are in an alluvial environment. Point and alternate bars, and channel fills are appropriate here.
Line 39. Be more specific on the intergranular porosity. Effective porosity with the Darcian flux?
Line 190. I don’t think you need equation 10.
Line 283. 21 equations are too many for this manuscript. I would reduce the number.
Line 390. Please, avoid the footnote. There is no need in this case.
Line 614. “Research and industrial contexts” better?
Figures and tables
Figures 1b, and c. Increase the graphic resolution.
Figure 5. Do you need regression lines on the graphs?
Figure 1A. This is a good conceptual figure. I would move in the main body of the manuscript.
Table 1. Expand caption.
Table 2. Same here. Expand the caption.