Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3672
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3672
22 Jul 2026
 | 22 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Time averaging for tendency budget analysis

Christopher Bladwell, Ryan M. Holmes, Jan D. Zika, Stephen M. Griffies, and Andrew E. Kiss

Abstract. Climate models can be used to quantify the processes that contribute to a property's change through analysis of the tendency terms in the budget of the property. For example, a heat budget can be performed to understand the processes driving an increase in the ocean's heat content under climate change. However, conventional budget analyses in climate models are typically performed without proper consideration of their relationship to the property of interest. Specifically, most studies consider standard arithmetic time-averages of budget terms. For the tendency term, this average is related to the difference between two time instants (snapshots) of the property and thus is strongly impacted by rapid fluctuations, or "weather".  Such an approach to budget analysis is thus less relevant to the "climate change" problem, that is, the difference between two long-term averages, or "epochs", of the property. Here we present a time-averaging method, referred to as the hat average, which exactly relates the processes contributing to a property's tendency budget to the epoch difference, or "climate change", of that property.  We demonstrate the utility of this method by applying it to the horizontally integrated heat budget of a global ocean model. We find that the hat average removes high-frequency variability, typically associated with rapid and noisy advective processes, and so allows for a clear measure of how processes contribute to changes in climate.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Christopher Bladwell, Ryan M. Holmes, Jan D. Zika, Stephen M. Griffies, and Andrew E. Kiss

Status: open (until 16 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Christopher Bladwell, Ryan M. Holmes, Jan D. Zika, Stephen M. Griffies, and Andrew E. Kiss
Christopher Bladwell, Ryan M. Holmes, Jan D. Zika, Stephen M. Griffies, and Andrew E. Kiss
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 22 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
To quantify climate change we compare long-term averages and not just day-to-day changes (weather). Climate simulations allow us to quantify the processes that contribute to climate change. However, the way these processes are conventionally analysed describes the change two instances of time, rather than the change in climate over long periods. We present an alternative way of quantifying how physical processes contribute to a changing climate, applying this method to an ocean model simulation.
Share