Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3278
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3278
21 Jul 2026
 | 21 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

The role of biologically-mediated fragmentation in carbon flux attenuation in a 1-D mechanistic particle model

Aaron Alexander Naidoo-Bagwell, Fanny Monteiro, Nathan Briggs, and Stephanie Henson

Abstract. The efficiency of particulate organic carbon (POC) transport through the water column is the foundation of the biological carbon pump’s capability to sequester atmospheric CO2 into the ocean interior over prolonged timescales. However, constraining the magnitude and composition of POC flux reaching ~ 1 km depth remains challenging, due to diverse biotic and abiotic processes that alter particle morphology, composition and sinking speed. Recent studies have highlighted biologically-mediated fragmentation, which breaks up particles into smaller, slower-sinking POC, as a potential primary driver for POC flux attenuation in the mesopelagic zone. Here, we use a vertical mechanistic particle model, based on the SISSOMA mixed-layer model, to assess the role of biologically-mediated fragmentation on diverse aggregates and POC flux attenuation. Our model resolves a spectrum of particles across size and density, incorporating a representation for particle associated copepodsas key agents of fragmentation below the mixed layer. Sensitivity experiments show fragmentation is critical to reproducing the observed initial decrease in particle size with depth. Fragmentation is shown to have a greater contribution to POC flux loss when export is increased and is composed of relatively larger particles, suggesting it is likely to be a more significant process for flux attenuation in more productive regions. We also demonstrate that the initial slope of particle size distribution at the export depth significantly influences the extent to which transformation processes affect particle size profiles and flux attenuation. While our results highlight the necessity of including fragmentation in biological pump models, fragmentation alone cannot fully account for observed profiles in particle size structure and transfer efficiency. We propose that additional sources of POC (e.g., fecal pellets) and transformation processes (e.g., differential remineralisation, ballasting) likely contribute to the discrepancies between our model and observations. Our results highlight the importance of explicitly representing fragmentation and particle diversity in biological pump models to improve mechanistic understanding and predictions of ocean carbon sequestration.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Aaron Alexander Naidoo-Bagwell, Fanny Monteiro, Nathan Briggs, and Stephanie Henson

Status: open (until 02 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Aaron Alexander Naidoo-Bagwell, Fanny Monteiro, Nathan Briggs, and Stephanie Henson
Aaron Alexander Naidoo-Bagwell, Fanny Monteiro, Nathan Briggs, and Stephanie Henson
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 22 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
We use a particle model to see the impact of fragmentation on particle flux and size with depth. We find, to reproduce the initial decrease in particle size observations, fragmentation must be included in the model, thus there is a need for future modelling studies to include it. We mimic seasonal conditions, finding the contribution of fragmentation to flux reduction increases at periods of high flux, thus the role of fragmentation may vary regionally and rely on productivity.
Share