Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3075
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3075
11 Jun 2026
 | 11 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Systematic Observation-Based Estimate of Effective Radiative Forcing from Aerosol–Cloud Interactions

Omer Roi-Cohen, Gaea Hadary, Casey J. Wall, Paulo Ceppi, and Guy Dagan

Abstract. The change in Earth's energy budget caused by anthropogenic aerosols interacting with clouds is the most uncertain contributor to the historical energy budget trend, with important implications for future climate projections. Recent studies estimating the effective radiative forcing from aerosol-cloud interactions (ERFaci) using satellite observations and a Cloud-Controlling Factor (CCF) analysis have produced a large spread of results, ranging from approximately -0.3 to -1.5 Wm-2. This spread is comparable to the full IPCC AR6 uncertainty range, reflecting the use of different datasets and methodological choices across studies, often without a systematic basis for selecting among them. Here we develop a unified framework to rigorously evaluate these methodological choices across multiple reanalysis datasets, using both climate model simulations and observed regional aerosol trends as independent validation tests. Applying model based bias-correction to the best configuration yields a best-estimate global ERFaci of -0.84 Wm-2 (66% confidence interval: -1.21 to -0.47 Wm-2) and an implied Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity of 3.33K (66% confidence interval: 2.65 to 4.22K), both consistent with IPCC AR6 and WCRP 2019 assessments but different from previous CCF-based estimates.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Omer Roi-Cohen, Gaea Hadary, Casey J. Wall, Paulo Ceppi, and Guy Dagan

Status: open (until 23 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Omer Roi-Cohen, Gaea Hadary, Casey J. Wall, Paulo Ceppi, and Guy Dagan
Omer Roi-Cohen, Gaea Hadary, Casey J. Wall, Paulo Ceppi, and Guy Dagan
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 11 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
When humans burn fossil fuels, released particles make clouds more reflective, cooling Earth. This effect is a major uncertainty in climate projections, and recent satellite studies disagree widely on its magnitude. We developed a framework, validated against models and observations, to test which analytical choices are most reliable. Our resulting estimate aligns with major international climate assessments, providing independent observational support for consensus climate projections.

 

Share