Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3041
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3041
22 Jul 2026
 | 22 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Complementing drought impact databases with multilingual online sources: A European gap-filling experiment

Monika Hlavsová, Lauro Rossi, Kathrin Szillat, Kerstin Stahl, Mirko D'Andrea, Veit Blauhut, Gabriela Ivaňáková, Livia Labudová, and Miroslav Trnka

Abstract. The use of drought impact databases has been increasingly recognized as essential for impact-based drought monitoring and risk assessment. The European Drought Impact Database (EDID) is the first continent-wide effort to systematically compile drought impact information across sectors and countries. However, the integration of existing regional and national datasets has revealed substantial spatial and temporal gaps, particularly for recent drought events and underrepresented countries. To address these deficiencies, we developed and evaluated a semiautomated retrospective gap-filling strategy that is based on multilingual online text searches, automated translation and classification, and expert validation. The workflow covered all official European Union languages, multiple drought events and nine affected sectors. It yielded several hundred new drought impact records and significantly improved coverage in selected countries. Nevertheless, the retrieval efficiency was low, and its performance varied strongly across languages and sectors. Our findings show that multilingual online data mining can complement drought impact databases but cannot replace sustained local monitoring and expert-driven data collection. Robust continental-scale drought impact monitoring, therefore, requires hybrid strategies that combine automated searches with national and regional inventories. The lessons learned from the EDID gap-filling experiment can guide future operational drought impact monitoring and similar efforts in other natural hazard domains.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Monika Hlavsová, Lauro Rossi, Kathrin Szillat, Kerstin Stahl, Mirko D'Andrea, Veit Blauhut, Gabriela Ivaňáková, Livia Labudová, and Miroslav Trnka

Status: open (until 02 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Monika Hlavsová, Lauro Rossi, Kathrin Szillat, Kerstin Stahl, Mirko D'Andrea, Veit Blauhut, Gabriela Ivaňáková, Livia Labudová, and Miroslav Trnka
Monika Hlavsová, Lauro Rossi, Kathrin Szillat, Kerstin Stahl, Mirko D'Andrea, Veit Blauhut, Gabriela Ivaňáková, Livia Labudová, and Miroslav Trnka

Viewed

Total article views: 59 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
46 8 5 59 5 5
  • HTML: 46
  • PDF: 8
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 59
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jul 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jul 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 59 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 59 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Information about drought impacts is often incomplete because collecting such data requires substantial time and resources. We tested whether online news articles available in all official EU languages could help fill gaps in the European Drought Impact Database. The approach added many new records, especially for recent droughts, but results varied strongly between countries and sectors. Online sources can improve drought monitoring, but expert observations and local reporting remain essential.
Share