the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Complementing drought impact databases with multilingual online sources: A European gap-filling experiment
Abstract. The use of drought impact databases has been increasingly recognized as essential for impact-based drought monitoring and risk assessment. The European Drought Impact Database (EDID) is the first continent-wide effort to systematically compile drought impact information across sectors and countries. However, the integration of existing regional and national datasets has revealed substantial spatial and temporal gaps, particularly for recent drought events and underrepresented countries. To address these deficiencies, we developed and evaluated a semiautomated retrospective gap-filling strategy that is based on multilingual online text searches, automated translation and classification, and expert validation. The workflow covered all official European Union languages, multiple drought events and nine affected sectors. It yielded several hundred new drought impact records and significantly improved coverage in selected countries. Nevertheless, the retrieval efficiency was low, and its performance varied strongly across languages and sectors. Our findings show that multilingual online data mining can complement drought impact databases but cannot replace sustained local monitoring and expert-driven data collection. Robust continental-scale drought impact monitoring, therefore, requires hybrid strategies that combine automated searches with national and regional inventories. The lessons learned from the EDID gap-filling experiment can guide future operational drought impact monitoring and similar efforts in other natural hazard domains.
- Preprint
(2019 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 13 Nov 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3041', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Oct 2026 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 184 | 99 | 31 | 314 | 38 | 36 |
- HTML: 184
- PDF: 99
- XML: 31
- Total: 314
- BibTeX: 38
- EndNote: 36
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The authors present a semi-automated workflow (multilingual Google queries, text extraction, GPT-3.5 classification, and expert validation) to fill spatial and temporal gaps in the European Drought Impact Database (EDID) and compare the outcome with the Slovak national drought monitoring network. The goal is important, and the task is complex: continental-scale, multilingual drought impact data is much needed and could be a useful community resource.
Although the study's goal is highly relevant, the results are not properly evaluated (or at least the documentation is lacking). Some numbers do not reconcile. As it stands, the workflow relies on many manual, resource-intensive steps, and validation of each step is not properly documented. As a result, the results cannot be reproduced. Also, from a practical point of view, the added value of the contribution is not so clear since the proposed approach retrieved few entries.
General comments
Minor details
L97: It is unclear what the “initial pilot version of the EDID” is (is it a specific publication?).
L139: Report the number of URLs for which extraction failed and whether the flagged articles were inspected.
L153: State how many summaries were reviewed.
Fig. 4: Indicate in the panel titles that (a, c) show the existing EDID and (b, d) the gap-filled data. Panels c and d lack system names in their legends.
L53–54 “reflect” appears twice
L112 “become” → “became”
L193 “indcates”
L334 “In this study, evaluated … were evaluated”
L345 “querries”
“Czech Republic” vs. “Czechia” and “Luxemburg” → “Luxembourg”