the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Coarse-mode sea spray aerosols enhance warm rain formation in in marine low clouds
Abstract. Precipitation in low clouds affects cloud responses to aerosol perturbations, thereby impacting aerosol radiative forcing of climate, a significant but indeterminate contribution to uncertainty in future warming. The onset of drizzle formation in marine low clouds may be influenced by the presence of supermicron sea salt aerosols. These particles can act as giant CCN (GCCN) that benefit from rapid condensational growth to a size that initiates collision-coalescence. Aircraft-based in-situ observations of cloud microphysical properties and aerosol size distributions from the Aerosol Cloud meTeorology Interactions oVer the western ATlantic Experiment (ACTIVATE) are analyzed from January–June 2022. Observations from a cloud aerosol spectrometer and a cloud droplet probe in clear air are used to quantify GCCN size distributions. Modest correlations are found between GCCN and near surface-level wind speeds when averaged together into wind speed bins, a result consistent with other studies. Observed GCCN distributions and cloud thicknesses are used to drive simulations within a 1-dimensional kinematic super droplet model, exploring the conditions under which the observed GCCN distributions induce a first-order impact on precipitation rate. The model demonstrates that even relatively small GCCN salt masses (~1 μg m-3) can accelerate the onset of drizzle in lightly precipitating marine low clouds. Similarly, a statistical analysis of in-cloud data shows the ratio of rainwater to total condensed water is higher when GCCN concentration/mass is above average. Together, the results indicate a significant influence of GCCN on precipitation formation in marine low clouds.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(2779 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 28 Jul 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3027', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Jul 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Katherine Mifsud, 15 Jul 2026
reply
We thank the reviewer (R1) for their thoughtful and constructive review of our manuscript. In response to these comments, we will revise the manuscript to distinguish between GCCN number concentration and GCCN mass concentration and consistently use the notation 𝑁d›2 and 𝑀d›2 when appropriate. We will explicitly define the variables used in Figure 7 and include an additional version of Figure 9 as a scatterplot to make the temporal relationships more apparent. This will be included in the supplemental section.
We thank the reviewer again for their careful review and for the time they devoted to providing these comments.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3027-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Katherine Mifsud, 15 Jul 2026
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3027', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Jul 2026
reply
Please see the attachment.
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47 | 16 | 8 | 71 | 3 | 5 |
- HTML: 47
- PDF: 16
- XML: 8
- Total: 71
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please find my comments attached.