Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2881
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2881
17 Jul 2026
 | 17 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Systematic deviation in wavelet-based covariance estimation and implications for eddy-covariance flux calculations

Jonathan Bitton, Bernard Heinesch, Samuel Nicolay, and Catherine Charles

Abstract. Accurate estimation of variance and covariance is central to the analysis of geophysical time series and underpins key diagnostics such as turbulent fluxes in eddy-covariance (EC) measurements. Continuous wavelet transform (CWT) methods are widely used for this purpose due to their ability to represent non-stationary and multi-scale processes. However, the consistency of commonly used formulations with the theoretical properties of the CWT has not been fully clarified. In this work, we show that the widely used formulation of Torrence and Compo can lead to systematic deviations in covariance estimation, which can be traced to normalization choices that are not fully consistent with the CWT reconstruction framework. These deviations, of the order of 10–15 % under typical conditions, are observed across a range of signal types, including deterministic, white-noise, and long-range dependent processes. We derive an alternative formulation directly from the CWT reconstruction identity, ensuring consistency with wavelet energy conservation. This approach reduces bias and improves convergence properties. Application to EC data shows that the proposed formulation recovers classical covariance estimates under stationary conditions while providing a more consistent framework for the analysis of non-stationary signals. These results emphasize the importance of scale-consistent estimation of second-order moments for interpreting geophysical variability and turbulent fluxes, and provide a methodological basis for multi-scale analysis of environmental time series.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jonathan Bitton, Bernard Heinesch, Samuel Nicolay, and Catherine Charles

Status: open (until 22 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jonathan Bitton, Bernard Heinesch, Samuel Nicolay, and Catherine Charles

Model code and software

Wavelet analysis python/matlab codes Jonathan Bitton https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20187583

Jonathan Bitton, Bernard Heinesch, Samuel Nicolay, and Catherine Charles
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 17 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
We investigated how wavelet-based methods estimate variance and covariance in time‑varying environmental data. We found that a widely used approach introduces systematic deviations of about 10–15 % under typical conditions. By introducing an alternative formulation, we reduced these discrepancies and improved estimation accuracy. Since these estimates are used to quantify exchanges of energy and gases, even moderate systematic deviations may influence long-term environmental analyses.
Share