ELM-TAM: a structure-based, function-oriented land model embracing fine-root system complexity
Abstract. Land models typically represent the entire fine-root system as a single homogeneous pool, collapsing structural and functional complexity into one set of parameters. This simplification weakens the belowground feedbacks that balance source-driven carbon dynamics. Here, we integrate the TAM (Transport and Absorptive fine roots with Mycorrhizal fungi) framework into the E3SM Land Model (ELM), replacing the single fine-root pool with three pools — transport roots, absorptive roots, and mycorrhizal fungi — defined by their roles in resource conduction, nutrient acquisition, and symbiotic exchange, each governed by pool-specific C : N ratios, longevity, allocation coefficients, and litter chemistry (21 new parameters). Sobol sensitivity analysis at 13 FLUXNET sites spanning 13 natural PFTs in ELM reveals a two-strategy parameterization dichotomy: deciduous and grass plant functional types (PFTs) concentrate variance in 2–3 allocation parameters, while evergreen PFTs distribute sensitivity across 5–6 parameters spanning chemistry, longevity, and allocation. Surrogate-assisted Bayesian calibration produces emergent fine-root properties that diverge from ELM defaults, with system-level nitrogen demand increasing at 10 of 14 PFTs (up to 4.3 ×) and absorptive-root longevity spanning 0.5–3.5 yr. A three-tier validation framework—monthly evaluation, temporal out-of-sample, and spatial out-of-sample—demonstrates that these changes yield transferable improvements: improved seasonal amplitude fidelity (mean GPP amplitude ratio 0.99 vs. 1.38 for the baseline), near-elimination of ER bias at a deciduous site (MBE from + 515 to + 33 gC m⁻² yr⁻¹), and cross-continental parameter transfer for C4 grasses (81 % RMSE reduction). Degradation at evergreen sites where the baseline overestimates productivity identifies a scope boundary where a belowground-only improvement cannot remedy upstream source-side bias. The function-oriented design provides natural coupling points for future extensions, including mechanistic root–water interactions and depth-resolved root profiles. ELM-TAM demonstrates that resolving belowground structural heterogeneity strengthens sink-based controls on the carbon cycle without overparameterization, establishing a foundation for these extensions and for global benchmarking in Earth System land models.
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
You have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other long-term archival and publishing alternatives, such as Zenodo.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
Later, if the Topical Editor decides to continue with the review or publication process of your manuscript and you are requested to upload a new version of it, then The 'Code and Data Availability’ section of your manuscript must also be modified to cite the new repository location, and the corresponding reference added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor