Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2719
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2719
27 May 2026
 | 27 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

The Role of the Atmosphere during the 2023 Antarctic Sea Ice Minimum

Matthew Goodwin, Adam Bateson, and Jake Aylmer

Abstract. In February 2023, Antarctic sea ice extent reached a record minimum, yet the mechanisms driving this event remain debated.
Here we use a coupled ocean–sea ice model (NEMO-SI3) forced by two different atmospheric reanalyses, ERA5 and JRA-55-
do, to investigate the drivers of the 2023 minimum and assess the sensitivity of inferred mechanisms to reanalysis choice. Both
simulations capture exceptionally low February sea ice extent during the 2022/23 melt season, though neither atmospheric5
reanalysis reproduces 2023 as a record minimum, with JRA-55-do showing closer agreement with observations. Substantial
regional differences emerge between the two simulations in February 2023: JRA-55-do produces greater sea ice coverage in
the Amundsen–Bellingshausen and Ross sectors, while ERA5 yields higher concentrations in the Weddell and Indian Ocean
sectors. We further investigate the atmospheric differences between the atmospheric reanalyses - differences in downwelling
longwave radiation are the strongest disparity in October, whereas shortwave radiation is the primary disparity in February-10
suggesting a role for these atmospheric differences in the differing sea ice outcome between the two simulations. Much of the
existing literature attributes the 2023 minimum to mechanisms inferred from a single reanalysis, most commonly ERA5. Our
results demonstrate that reanalysis choice produces markedly different regional sea ice responses, with implications for the
interpretation of both thermodynamic and dynamical drivers. We therefore recommend caution when diagnosing real-world
sea ice events from reanalysis-forced simulations and that multiple reanalysis products could be employed to improve the15
robustness of inferred mechanisms

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Matthew Goodwin, Adam Bateson, and Jake Aylmer

Status: open (until 08 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Matthew Goodwin, Adam Bateson, and Jake Aylmer
Matthew Goodwin, Adam Bateson, and Jake Aylmer
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 27 May 2026
Download
Short summary
In February 2023, Antarctic sea ice shrank to its smallest recorded extent, but the cause remains debated. We used an ocean and sea ice model tested with two different atmospheric datasets (reanalyses). Both captured the unusually low sea ice, but suggested different regional patterns and causes. This shows that conclusions about what drove the record low depend heavily on which dataset is used — something previous studies overlooked. We recommend using multiple atmospheric reanalyses.
Share