Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2649
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2649
21 May 2026
 | 21 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

A Multi-Criteria Framework for CORDEX-CORE2 GCM Selection

Moetasim Ashfaq, Erika Coppola, Chris Lennard, Claas Teichmann, Deeksha Rastogi, Elias Massoud, Erasmo Buonomo, Eun-Soon Im, George Zittis, Jason P. Evans, Jesus Fernandez, Katherine J. Evans, Maria Leidinice da Silva, Marianna Adinolfi, Melissa Bukovsky, Rosmeri Porfirio da Rocha, Shabeh ul Hasson, Silvina A. Solman, Stefan Sobolowski, Sushant Das, Swen Brands, Tereza Cavazos, Thanh Ngo-Duc, and Xuejie Gao

Abstract. We present a structured multi-criteria framework for the sub-selection of CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) to support CORDEX-CORE2 dynamical downscaling. The framework integrates five key criteria: historical performance, model independence, regional temperature sensitivity, precipitation spread, and data availability, and is designed to identify a single, consistent subset of GCMs across all CORDEX domains to improve the comparability and interpretability of regional projections. A total of 45 GCMs are evaluated over the historical period (1981–2014), with 31 models further assessed for projected changes over 2015–2100. Application of the framework shows that model performance is systematically higher for large-scale circulation and thermodynamic fields than for precipitation seasonality and monsoon-related processes, which remain a dominant source of uncertainty across regions. Despite the diversity of climates represented across CORDEX domains, model rankings are broadly consistent, with top-performing models exhibiting stable performance across both tropical and extratropical regions, while lower-ranked models show more pervasive deficiencies rather than region-specific weaknesses. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that rankings are largely insensitive to the choice of aggregation method but depend strongly on the breadth of evaluation metrics, with robust and reproducible rankings emerging only when a large fraction of the full metric suite is retained. Assessment of model independence reveals substantial clustering within the ensemble, indicating that many models share similar performance characteristics, while a smaller subset provides distinct and complementary information. Regional temperature sensitivity exhibits a coherent ordering across domains, suggesting that differences in projected warming are primarily governed by intrinsic model characteristics rather than region-specific effects. In contrast, precipitation spread shows strong regional variability, with both the magnitude and temporal structure of precipitation change differing widely across models. The relationship between precipitation and warming further highlights that, in some regions, precipitation responses scale with temperature, while in others they are dominated by circulation variability. By combining these criteria with data availability constraints, the framework identifies a reduced set of models that retains key aspects of performance, diversity, and projected change. This approach provides a transparent and reproducible basis for GCM selection within CORDEX-CORE2 and offers a generalizable strategy for coordinated regional climate modeling efforts.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Moetasim Ashfaq, Erika Coppola, Chris Lennard, Claas Teichmann, Deeksha Rastogi, Elias Massoud, Erasmo Buonomo, Eun-Soon Im, George Zittis, Jason P. Evans, Jesus Fernandez, Katherine J. Evans, Maria Leidinice da Silva, Marianna Adinolfi, Melissa Bukovsky, Rosmeri Porfirio da Rocha, Shabeh ul Hasson, Silvina A. Solman, Stefan Sobolowski, Sushant Das, Swen Brands, Tereza Cavazos, Thanh Ngo-Duc, and Xuejie Gao

Status: open (until 16 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Moetasim Ashfaq, Erika Coppola, Chris Lennard, Claas Teichmann, Deeksha Rastogi, Elias Massoud, Erasmo Buonomo, Eun-Soon Im, George Zittis, Jason P. Evans, Jesus Fernandez, Katherine J. Evans, Maria Leidinice da Silva, Marianna Adinolfi, Melissa Bukovsky, Rosmeri Porfirio da Rocha, Shabeh ul Hasson, Silvina A. Solman, Stefan Sobolowski, Sushant Das, Swen Brands, Tereza Cavazos, Thanh Ngo-Duc, and Xuejie Gao
Moetasim Ashfaq, Erika Coppola, Chris Lennard, Claas Teichmann, Deeksha Rastogi, Elias Massoud, Erasmo Buonomo, Eun-Soon Im, George Zittis, Jason P. Evans, Jesus Fernandez, Katherine J. Evans, Maria Leidinice da Silva, Marianna Adinolfi, Melissa Bukovsky, Rosmeri Porfirio da Rocha, Shabeh ul Hasson, Silvina A. Solman, Stefan Sobolowski, Sushant Das, Swen Brands, Tereza Cavazos, Thanh Ngo-Duc, and Xuejie Gao
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 21 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Producing reliable regional climate projections requires carefully selecting which global climate models drive them. We developed a transparent and reproducible framework to identify a balanced, representative subset of models for the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment, a major international effort to generate high-resolution climate projections worldwide. While designed for this initiative, the framework is broadly applicable to other models sub-selection efforts.
Share