Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2222
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2222
24 Apr 2026
 | 24 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Spurious seasonality of Earth observation LAI across three northern evergreen needleleaf forests: Implications for analyses of the carbon cycle

Tim J. Green, David T. Milodowski, T. Luke Smallman, Annikki Mäkelä, and Mathew Williams

Abstract. Leaf area index (LAI) is a key biophysical variable which quantifies the surface area for light capture and photosynthetic activity per unit ground area, giving a first order constraint on potential photosynthesis. LAI is tightly coupled to the carbon, energy, and water cycles of the global terrestrial system. Numerous Earth observation (EO) products provide estimates of LAI over time (LAIEO), delivering valuable information on plant phenology and canopy dynamics. Widely-used LAIEO, however, consistently exhibit unrealistic seasonality in evergreen needleleaf forests at the northern latitudes. Taking a model-data fusion approach, we show that naïvely assimilating biased, whole-year LAIEO (i.e., the business-as-usual (BAU) approach) at three well-studied evergreen needleleaf forests in Fennoscandia implies an ecosystem carbon cycle which is unrealistic and inconsistent with independent lines of evidence. We further demonstrate that the model-data fusion framework, CARDAMOM, is capable of diagnosing realistic seasonal amplitudes of LAI by assimilating localised information on leaf lifespan coupled with summer-only LAIEO (i.e., the alternative (ALT) approach). Important differences arise from the BAU and ALT experiments. The BAU experiment showed highly seasonal canopy dynamics and diagnostic leaf traits erroneously consistent with deciduous species. Conversely, the ALT experiment displayed canopy dynamics and functional characteristics more reflective of evergreen needleleaf species. For BAU, biases in LAIEO propagated throughout the carbon cycle, especially in the southern, more productive sites. This investigation highlights the need for improved LAIEO estimates in northern evergreen forests to enhance understanding of carbon cycle processes in this region of rapid warming and large carbon stores, and provides a mechanism for improvement using independent leaf trait data.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Tim J. Green, David T. Milodowski, T. Luke Smallman, Annikki Mäkelä, and Mathew Williams

Status: open (until 05 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Tim J. Green, David T. Milodowski, T. Luke Smallman, Annikki Mäkelä, and Mathew Williams
Tim J. Green, David T. Milodowski, T. Luke Smallman, Annikki Mäkelä, and Mathew Williams
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 24 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Widely used satellite-based products of leaf area index (LAI) used in carbon cycle studies consistently show unrealistically high seasonality over northern evergreen needleleaf forests. This study uses a model-data fusion approach to show how these biases adversely affect carbon cycle model results by comparing outputs against a calibration that includes leaf lifespan data and summer-only LAI. Results highlight the urgent need for modelling studies and LAI producers to address these biases.
Share