Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1906
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1906
13 May 2026
 | 13 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Measurement Report: Differences in cloud optical and microphysical properties in the Arctic and Antarctic derived using thermal infrared spectroscopy

Joseph Hung, Penny M. Rowe, Christopher J. Cox, Emily M. McCullough, Liam Kroll, Raia Ottenheimer, Matthew D. Shupe, Von P. Walden, and Kimberly Strong

Abstract. Climate models struggle to accurately represent polar regions, largely due to the difficulty in modeling clouds. The uncertainty budget of polar radiation is dominated by cloud and cloud-aerosol interactions, but challenges in maintaining robust field observations mean that even basic knowledge such as cloud occurrence is not well known. Measurements of the thermal emission of Earth’s atmosphere can help close this knowledge gap due to the sensitivity of this spectral region to radiative properties of clouds. Measurements of the downwelling atmospheric emission (400 to 3000 cm−1) have been collected at two polar field sites using Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI) instruments, two at the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL) in Eureka, Canada (80° N), for which we use data from 2006 to 2022, and another at McMurdo Station (77° S) in Antarctica as part of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) West Antarctica Radiation Experiment (AWARE) project in 2016. We analyze these spectra, with supplementary data from other instruments and models, to compare optical and microphysical properties of moderately thick clouds at Eureka and McMurdo Station, including optical depth, thermodynamic phase, liquid droplet and ice crystal effective scattering radii, and cloud boundaries. We find that the clouds sampled at McMurdo generally feature lower temperatures, smaller liquid droplets, a more concentrated distribution of ice effective radii, less seasonal variability in optical depth, and lower optical thickness because they consist of a higher proportion of ice than those at Eureka. Additionally, both locations have high occurrence rates of supercooled liquid and mixed-phase clouds and exhibit differences between single-phase and mixed-phase microphysics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Joseph Hung, Penny M. Rowe, Christopher J. Cox, Emily M. McCullough, Liam Kroll, Raia Ottenheimer, Matthew D. Shupe, Von P. Walden, and Kimberly Strong

Status: open (until 24 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Joseph Hung, Penny M. Rowe, Christopher J. Cox, Emily M. McCullough, Liam Kroll, Raia Ottenheimer, Matthew D. Shupe, Von P. Walden, and Kimberly Strong

Data sets

Replication Data for: Differences in cloud optical and microphysical properties in the Arctic and Antarctic derived using thermal infrared spectroscopy J. Hung et al. https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/XSH1IJ

Joseph Hung, Penny M. Rowe, Christopher J. Cox, Emily M. McCullough, Liam Kroll, Raia Ottenheimer, Matthew D. Shupe, Von P. Walden, and Kimberly Strong
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 13 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Climate models struggle to accurately represent polar regions largely due to challenges in modelling clouds. In this article, we sampled clouds at Arctic and Antarctic field sites, and found that Antarctic clouds generally featured lower temperatures, smaller liquid droplets, and are thinner because they have a higher proportion of ice than Arctic clouds. This knowledge improves our ability to monitor remote regions, and serves to improve our understanding of cloud processes.
Share