Temporally Coherent Modeling of Tropical Cyclone Compound Flooding for Reliable Coastal Hazard Estimation
Abstract. Tropical-cyclone-induced coastal flooding results from the combined action of multiple interdependent processes, whose temporal phasing and magnitude govern the severity of inundation. Conventional statistical frameworks typically model these processes using static event maxima, neglecting their temporal evolution and implicitly forcing co-occurrence of component extremes, which can lead to biased or physically inconsistent design-level estimates. To address this limitation, this study applies the Multivariate Spatio-Temporal Maxima with Temporal Exposure (MSTM-TE) framework, which explicitly embeds temporal coherence in the simulation of compound extremes. The framework is applied to a long-term tropical cyclone dataset for Guadeloupe in the French Antilles, reconstructing time series of significant wave height, peak wave period, and sea surface height to generate physically consistent synthetic storm events. From these simulations, total water level (TWL) is computed as the sum of sea surface height and wave run-up, providing an integrated metric of coastal flooding hazard.
Results show that MSTM-TE reduces bias and ensemble variance in TWL return-level estimation relative to conventional multivariate and location-specific approaches, highlighting the importance of preserving intra-storm temporal structure. The reconstructed storm evolutions reveal systematic temporal alignment between peaks in TWL and a compound wave-energy variable, indicating that wave-induced run-up dominates design-level flooding in the study domain. These findings establish MSTM-TE as a physics-informed statistical framework that bridges data efficiency, spatio-temporal realism, and methodological efficiency, offering a robust pathway for compound coastal flood risk assessment under limited observational data.
This paper proposes the application of the MSTM-TE (Multivariate Spatio-Temporal Maxima with Temporal Exposure) framework to tropical cyclone-induced compound flooding risk assessment, with Guadeloupe as a case study, and systematically compares the statistical performance of trivariate and bivariate configurations. The research topic holds clear scientific significance, particularly in the practice of compound flooding risk assessment in tropical cyclone-prone regions. Overall, the research methodology framework of this paper is innovative, with the core contribution being the demonstration of the importance of preserving intra-storm temporal coherence for compound extreme value estimation. This manuscript fits within the scope of the journal and is worthy of consideration for publication after major revisions.
1.Abstract Section: It is recommended to supplement quantitative descriptions of key results and quantify the core findings.
2.Introduction Section: Further optimization is suggested regarding problem focus, logical coherence, and terminology transition.
3.Motivating Application Section: It is recommended to clarify the temporal resolution of the BRGM synthetic TC hindcast database, elaborate on the length of the time series, and explain how this resolution meets the dynamic simulation requirements of tropical cyclone processes.
4.Methodology Section
(1) In Section 3.1 Overview, there is a spelling error in "(3) performance evalaution" (should be "evaluation").
(2) In Section 3.2 Overview of the MSTM-TE Framework, there is a spelling error in "4. Each simulated MSTM vector is paired with an empircial TE set" (should be "empirical").
(3) For the MSTM-TE framework flowchart (Figure 3, methodology flowchart), it is recommended to supplement input/output data types for each step and label key parameters (e.g., quantiles for threshold selection).
(4) The discussion on the validation of the independence assumption should be further elaborated.
(5) In the details of multi-threshold aggregation, it is recommended to specify the exact proportion for "equal proportion of storms from each threshold" and explain how to address conflicts in simulation results under different thresholds.
5.Application Section
(1) It is recommended to provide explanatory analysis for cases such as large standard deviations of some parameters in Tables 1 and 2.
(2) It is recommended to supplement the physical interpretation of "timing-offset cases account for 1.93%" and discuss with specific storm cases.
6.References Section
(1) For the reference: Filippini, A., Bouvier, C., Laigre, T., Pedreros, R., Rohmer, J., Balouin, Y., and De La Torre, Y.: High resolution database of cyclone-induced waves for extreme analysis on the (French) Lesser Antilles, Scientific Data. In preparation., 2026. The status is marked as "In preparation"; please confirm if there is an updated status for this reference.
(2) For the reference: Bevacqua, E., Vousdoukas, M. I., Zappa, G., Hodges, K., Shepherd, T. G., Maraun, D., Mentaschi, L., and Feyen, L.: More meteorological events that drive compound coastal flooding are projected under climate change, Communications Earth & Environment, 1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00044-z, 2020. The journal name "Communications Earth amp; Environment" contains an error (should be "Communications Earth & Environment").
7.Supplementary Materials Section
(1) Tables S.5.8, S.5.9, and S.5.10 are titled "East cluster" but appear in Section S.5 (Results for the West Cluster); please confirm if this is an error.
(2) In Table S.5.7, some standard deviations (values in parentheses) are missing in the row "Tp|Hs"; it is recommended to supplement them.
(3) The captions for Figures S.7.1 and S.7.2 are identical; please confirm if this is an error.