Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1849
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1849
09 Apr 2026
 | 09 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).

Sea ice in the Barents and Kara Seas: models versus reanalyses

Cecilia Äijälä, Lucía Gutiérrez-Loza, Wolfgang Dorn, Siv K. Lauvset, Wieslaw Maslowski, and Petteri Uotila

Abstract. Satellite measurements indicate that the Barents and Kara Seas have experienced some of the most significant declines in sea ice concentration and an increase in sea surface temperature in the Arctic. Understanding the processes driving these changes is of utmost importance to assess the implications of climate change in the Arctic and globally. Given the observational limitations in these high-latitude areas, coupled models and reanalysis products play a key role. However, it is essential to better understand the strengths and limitations of such data products. Models are often evaluated on a pan-Arctic scale, but results might differ when considering sub-regions. This study examines two regional coupled ocean-atmosphere models (HIRHAM-NAOSIM 2.2 and RASM), two coupled model intercomparison project, phase 6 (CMIP6) models (CNRM-ESM2_1, NorESM2-MM), two regional ocean reanalyses (RARE 1.15.2 and TOPAZ 4B), one global reanalysis (ORAS5) and OSI-SAF satellite observations over the period 1991–2020. We focus on spring (March–April–May) and autumn (August–September–October) sea ice area and sea ice concentration, the edge of the sea ice, and the temperature of the mixed layer. The results show a statistically significant decrease in sea ice area and sea ice concentration in the satellite measurements and in all reanalyses. However, only one of the coupled models, HIRHAM–NAOSIM, exhibits a statistically significant sea ice decline in the Barents Sea, albeit weaker than in the reanalyses, and no coupled model shows a significant trend in the Kara Sea. Additionally, the reanalyses show a more pronounced warming of the mixed layer than the coupled models, particularly in autumn and in the Kara Sea.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Cecilia Äijälä, Lucía Gutiérrez-Loza, Wolfgang Dorn, Siv K. Lauvset, Wieslaw Maslowski, and Petteri Uotila

Status: open (until 04 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Cecilia Äijälä, Lucía Gutiérrez-Loza, Wolfgang Dorn, Siv K. Lauvset, Wieslaw Maslowski, and Petteri Uotila

Data sets

Code for Barents and Kara Seas model and reanalysis comparision analysis Cecilia Äijälä https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19328005

Cecilia Äijälä, Lucía Gutiérrez-Loza, Wolfgang Dorn, Siv K. Lauvset, Wieslaw Maslowski, and Petteri Uotila
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 09 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
This study compares coupled ocean–atmosphere models, reanalyses, and satellite data for 1991–2020 in the Barents and Kara Seas, where Arctic sea‑ice loss has been greatest. The results evaluate how well these products asses sea ice and ocean temperature. Reanalyses and satellites show strong sea‑ice decline, while models show little or none – only HIRHAM‑NAOSIM shows a weak decline in the Barents Sea. Reanalyses also indicate stronger mixed‑layer warming then the models, especially in autumn.
Share