Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1832
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1832
30 Apr 2026
 | 30 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Strategic Design of Methane Observation Networks to Improve Emission Estimates: A Case Study in Africa

Hui Li, Philippe Ciais, Frederic Chevallier, Bo Zheng, Paul Palmer, Frank Hase, Morgan Lopez, Elsa Ordway, Shushi Peng, Danielle Monteverde, Michel Ramonet, Jason Michael St. Clair, Le Bienfaiteur Sagang, and Benjamin Poulter

Abstract. Ground-based and satellite atmospheric observations are essential for reducing uncertainties in methane (CH4) emissions by atmospheric inversion, particularly in data-sparse regions such as Africa. However, adding new observation sites does not yield linear improvements of emission uncertainties because overlapping transport sensitivities reduces marginal information gain. Here we develop a Bayesian framework to strategically optimize CH4 observation network design for column retrievals from upward-looking Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometers (e.g., EM27/SUN), jointly identifying the optimal number of sites and their spatial configuration. The framework quantifies uncertainty reduction for grid-point (1°) total and sectoral emissions while accounting for transport redundancy, cloud screening, and observational errors. Using January and July as representative months, we find that uncertainty reduction increases rapidly during early network expansion but gradually saturates beyond a certain number of additional sites. An optimized configuration of ten new sites added to the existing network achieves over 65 % reduction in prior uncertainty for total African CH4 emissions in both months, with comparable improvements across fire, wetland, and anthropogenic sectors. Sensitivity analyses indicate that while the optimal number of sites varies with assumptions about cloud filtering, the spatial configuration remains robust, supporting cost-effective observation network design in data-sparse regions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Hui Li, Philippe Ciais, Frederic Chevallier, Bo Zheng, Paul Palmer, Frank Hase, Morgan Lopez, Elsa Ordway, Shushi Peng, Danielle Monteverde, Michel Ramonet, Jason Michael St. Clair, Le Bienfaiteur Sagang, and Benjamin Poulter

Status: open (until 11 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Hui Li, Philippe Ciais, Frederic Chevallier, Bo Zheng, Paul Palmer, Frank Hase, Morgan Lopez, Elsa Ordway, Shushi Peng, Danielle Monteverde, Michel Ramonet, Jason Michael St. Clair, Le Bienfaiteur Sagang, and Benjamin Poulter
Hui Li, Philippe Ciais, Frederic Chevallier, Bo Zheng, Paul Palmer, Frank Hase, Morgan Lopez, Elsa Ordway, Shushi Peng, Danielle Monteverde, Michel Ramonet, Jason Michael St. Clair, Le Bienfaiteur Sagang, and Benjamin Poulter
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 30 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We studied how to best place methane monitoring instruments across Africa to better understand where emissions come from. Because observations can overlap in what they detect, adding more sites does not always improve results equally. Using a statistical approach, we identified both the ideal number and locations of sites (ten new sites can reduce emission uncertainty by over 65 % for total African CH4). Our results help guide cost-effective monitoring strategies in regions with limited data.
Share