the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Revisiting Discharge Envelope Curves: Hydrometeorological Analysis and Lessons from the 4 July 2025 Kerr County Flash Flood
Abstract. Flash floods are a primary driver of flood mortality in semi-arid regions where compound risk factors amplify convective extremes. The 4 July 2025 Kerr County flash flood in the Texas Hill Country-a region colloquially designated "Flash Flood Alley"-represents a benchmark hydrometeorological event. Triggered by a quasi-stationary mesoscale convective system derived from Tropical Storm Barry remnants, the event delivered more than 508 mm of rainfall over 72 hours, with peak 3-hour intensities exceeding the local 1,000-year recurrence threshold (National Weather Service, 2025). Using NOAA Stage IV rainfall estimates, USGS streamflow records, and mass-balance modeling, we reconstruct the hydrometeorological response of the South Fork and mainstem Guadalupe River. Estimated peak discharges at the South Fork ranged from 7,221 to 7,505 m3 s−1 (255,000–265,000 ft3 s−1), approaching or exceeding the regional discharge envelope curve and surpassing the historical record set in July 1932. Antecedent drought may have contributed to runoff through hydrophobic soil behavior, while overnight timing and critical communication gaps compounded human impacts (137 fatalities). Numerous affected structures lay outside FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Areas, exposing the limitations of historically calibrated static hazard maps. The findings support a transition toward impact-based warning protocols, expanded monitoring networks, and climate-aware hazard mapping for topographically complex, data-sparse regions.
- Preprint
(6565 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1750', Sheeba Thomas, 30 Jun 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1750', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Aug 2026
This manuscript reconstructs and assesses the catastrophic 4 July 2025 flash flood in Kerr County, Texas. The extreme event offers valuable insights into climate-driven flood extremes in semi-arid zones and carries great scientific and practical value. However, enhancements are needed in the description of technical details and discussions. Specific recommendations are as follows:
1. The core conclusion that the flood exceeded the regional discharge envelope curve relies only on a first-order mass-balance model. Cross-verification with standard hydrological models would strengthen this result.
2. As revisiting discharge envelope curves is the main theme, supporting evidence needs enrichment. Comparisons with other extreme flash floods are missing, and the inference that warming shifts envelope curves upward lacks quantitative climate or return-period data.
3. Discussions are restricted to Texas watersheds. Global comparisons of similar semi-arid flash flood risks and detailed solutions for non-stationary flood models and impact-based warnings will broaden the study’s applicability.
4. Fatality data are only displayed in simple classified charts without quantitative risk analysis. Quantify exposed populations via inundation data, and build correlations between water depth, warning delay and mortality to distinguish vulnerabilities of camps, residences and RV parks.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1750-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 165 | 170 | 18 | 353 | 21 | 20 |
- HTML: 165
- PDF: 170
- XML: 18
- Total: 353
- BibTeX: 21
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1)Please include and label USGS gauges in Figure 3 or if it is better, create another figure with the gauges clearly labeled and be consistent in the narrative when referencing them.
2) Figure 6 looks like a very important figure; the current explanation is not enough. Consider adding more details on how the envelope curve was created and more details on how the other data points were included into this figure, Figure 6.