Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1633
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1633
18 May 2026
 | 18 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Horizontal sensible heat advection increases snow melt rates: Beyond point measurements

Eli Schwat, Michael Haugeneder, Dylan Reynolds, Daniel Hogan, Ethan Gutmann, and Jessica D. Lundquist

Abstract. In the atmospheric surface layer, it is generally assumed that vertical fluxes dominate near-surface heat transport and heat exchange between the atmosphere and the earth's surface. However, when the earth's surface is covered in patchy snow, near-surface horizontal advection of heat may be significant, and it's impact on snow melt rates is disputed. We estimated the contribution of horizontal sensible heat advection (QH) to snow melt using 8 days of measurements collected in May 2023 in the alpine East River basin in Colorado, Rocky Mountains, USA. We used an infrared video camera and polyester sheet to estimate QH, 3-meter resolution satellite imagery to track fractional snow covered area (fSCA), a scanning lidar to estimate snow melt rates, and micrometeorological and eddy covariance measurements to characterize the surface energy balance. Infrared camera measurements of QH over a single snow patch show that QH contributes to snow melt and is largest at the patch's upwind edge. Lidar-based snow melt measurements show that melt rates are highest at the upwind edge, further suggesting that QH causes snow melt. Over four days when fSCA was less than 62%, QH estimates ranged from  234–584 W m-2 and mid-day net radiation ranged from 331–508 W m-2. When we considered only vertical heat fluxes, radiative fluxes, and snow melt in a snow patch surface energy balance equation, we found a mid-day residual between 267–668  W m-2, and the residual increased as fSCA decreased. The approximate match between the energy balance residual and estimated QH suggests that advection is an important factor to consider when predicting snow melt. On days with low fSCA (< 62%), horizontal advection may contribute as much to snow melt as net radiation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Eli Schwat, Michael Haugeneder, Dylan Reynolds, Daniel Hogan, Ethan Gutmann, and Jessica D. Lundquist

Status: open (until 30 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Eli Schwat, Michael Haugeneder, Dylan Reynolds, Daniel Hogan, Ethan Gutmann, and Jessica D. Lundquist
Eli Schwat, Michael Haugeneder, Dylan Reynolds, Daniel Hogan, Ethan Gutmann, and Jessica D. Lundquist
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 19 May 2026
Download
Short summary
When snow covers the ground in disparate patches, heat can move sideways and cause snow melt. Using field measurements in Colorado, we found that "sideways" heat warms the edges of snow patches and causes faster melt. When snow cover was low, this sideways heat was as important as sunlight. Standard models miss this effect, so including it can improve snowmelt predictions.
Share