Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-16
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-16
03 Feb 2026
 | 03 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Dissimilar Roles of Aerosols, Nitrogen Deposition and Ozone on the Terrestrial Carbon Sink in China during 2010–2020

Nanhong Xie, Tijian Wang, Shu Li, Bingliang Zhuang, Mengmeng Li, Min Xie, Qian Zhang, Danyang Ma, Jane Liu, Jing M. Chen, Zhaozhong Feng, Dimitrios Melas, and Kostas Karatzas

Abstract. China's Clean Air Action (CAA) plan implemented since 2013 has significantly altered atmospheric composition, and yet its impact on the terrestrial carbon sink remains unclear. This study employed the Regional Earth System Model (RegESM), an online-coupled climate–chemistry–ecosystem modeling framework, to quantify the impacts of aerosols, surface ozone (O3), and nitrogen deposition on China’s net ecosystem productivity (NEP) from 2010 to 2020. The results show that aerosols enhanced China’s NEP by 17.93 TgC yr-1 (4.49 % of the total NEP), primarily by increasing diffuse radiation, with the most pronounced effects in Southern and Eastern China. Nitrogen deposition further increased NEP by 37.98 TgC yr-1 (9.52 %), concentrated in Central and Southern regions. In contrast, O3 pollution reduced NEP by 51.33 TgC yr-1 (12.9 %), particularly in the forest-dominated Southeast. The positive impacts of aerosols and nitrogen deposition on the carbon sink weakened over time, whereas the negative influence of O3 was increasing. The combined effects indicate that CAA-induced atmospheric chemistry changes reversed the dominant atmospheric drivers of China’s terrestrial carbon sink, from enhancement by aerosols and nitrogen deposition to suppression by ozone. Our findings highlight the need for stronger O3 pollution control to achieve co-benefits between air-quality improvement and carbon neutrality.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Nanhong Xie, Tijian Wang, Shu Li, Bingliang Zhuang, Mengmeng Li, Min Xie, Qian Zhang, Danyang Ma, Jane Liu, Jing M. Chen, Zhaozhong Feng, Dimitrios Melas, and Kostas Karatzas

Status: open (until 17 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Nanhong Xie, Tijian Wang, Shu Li, Bingliang Zhuang, Mengmeng Li, Min Xie, Qian Zhang, Danyang Ma, Jane Liu, Jing M. Chen, Zhaozhong Feng, Dimitrios Melas, and Kostas Karatzas
Nanhong Xie, Tijian Wang, Shu Li, Bingliang Zhuang, Mengmeng Li, Min Xie, Qian Zhang, Danyang Ma, Jane Liu, Jing M. Chen, Zhaozhong Feng, Dimitrios Melas, and Kostas Karatzas
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 03 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
Since 2013, China’s Clean Air Action has altered land carbon uptake. Our modeling shows that while aerosols and nitrogen deposition previously boosted the carbon sink, their effects have weakened. Conversely, ozone's negative impact has grown. This shifts the overall atmospheric influence from enhancement to suppression. Controlling ozone is thus key for dual benefits in clean air and carbon neutrality.
Share