the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Application of radar remote sensing for cyclone damage mapping in Bangladesh: A coherence-based approach
Abstract. Rapid and reliable assessment of cyclone-induced damage remains a major challenge in coastal regions where cloud cover and accessibility limit conventional approaches. This study presents a coherence-based Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) framework for identifying as well as quantifying cyclone-induced surface changes in coastal districts in Bangladesh. Multi-temporal Sentinel-1 data were analyzed using interferometric coherence to capture spatial and temporal variations associated with five major cyclones: Amphan (2020), Sitrang (2022), Mocha (2023), Hamoon (2023), and Remal (2024). A time-series approach incorporating multiple pre-, during-, and post-event image pairs was implemented to distinguish cyclone-driven changes from natural surface variability and to improve detection reliability. The results reveal a consistent decline in coherence during cyclone events followed by gradual recovery. Spatial analysis indicates that areas of significant coherence loss correspond to zones affected by flooding, vegetation damage, and structural disruption. Estimated damage extents varied across cyclones, with Remal (2024) showing the largest affected area (~601 km²), followed by Mocha (~474 km²), Amphan (~288 km²), Sitrang (~122 km²), and Hamoon (~117 km²). Validation using field observations and secondary data yielded an overall classification accuracy of 94 %, confirming the robustness of the coherence-based approach. Complementary inundation mapping further demonstrated that coherence captures a broader spectrum of cyclone impacts beyond flood extent alone, including wind-induced damage and geomorphic changes. This study establishes multi-temporal SAR coherence analysis as a scalable, cloud-independent, and operationally effective tool for rapid post-cyclone damage assessment. The proposed framework enhances the reliability of disaster monitoring in complex coastal environments and offers strong potential for integration into near-real-time disaster response systems. Future research should focus on integrating multi-sensor datasets and long-term coherence time series to further refine damage characterization and reduce uncertainty.
- Preprint
(2974 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1545', Iftakhar Ahmed, 30 Apr 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Md. Shahoriar Sarker, 02 May 2026
Thank you so much for your comment and interest in this work.
This study differs from previous research conducted in the region in several key aspects. Earlier studies in Bangladesh have predominantly relied on optical remote sensing or post-event field assessments for cyclone damage mapping, which are often constrained by cloud cover, data availability, and delayed response times. In contrast, the present study employs a coherence-based approach using Sentinel-1 SAR data, enabling reliable damage detection irrespective of weather conditions and ensuring rapid assessment immediately after cyclone events.In addition, this study integrates multi-temporal SAR analysis with field-based validation, allowing for a more robust and accurate representation of damage patterns. Unlike many previous works that focus on single-event analysis or qualitative assessments, this research provides a quantitative and spatially explicit framework for evaluating cyclone-induced impacts.
Furthermore, the proposed approach emphasizes operational applicability, offering a practical tool for near-real-time disaster response and decision-making in data-scarce and hazard-prone regions such as coastal Bangladesh.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1545-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Md. Shahoriar Sarker, 02 May 2026
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1545', Giovanni Scardino, 22 May 2026
This work is well-written and reports a well-explained methodological approach of SAR coherence analysis. Here, the coherence analysis was used to detected the impact of tropical cyclones in Bangladesh. The methodological approach is well-reported and allow to be reproducible in other context. An important point is the improvements of the outcome description, by way of example improving the visualization of the flooded surfaces. I have very few comments that can help to improve the manuscript.
Line 91: Figure 1. With the location of the areas, it could be useful to insert also the cyclone tracks for the events considered in this study.
Line 149: the acronym SNAP was defined before.
Line 229: For Figures 4 and 5, can you highlight the coastal areas? In order to highlight the flooded areas from other. Furthermore, insert some toponyms following those cited in the main text.
Line 258: Higlight in the maps the location of coastal barrier islands impacted by cyclone Hamoon.
Line 264: Here the subsection deserves to be improved. The validation is not adequately reported. I suggest to plot the output of the coherence analysis with the same geotagged picture.
Line 296: The subsection 5.1 needs to be improved, in which the discussion should report also comparison of the applied method with literature. Here, no literature is reported.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1545-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Md. Shahoriar Sarker, 12 Jul 2026
We would like to thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We sincerely appreciate the valuable comments and suggestions, which have helped improve the quality and clarity of our work. Our detailed point-by-point responses are provided in the attached PDF.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Md. Shahoriar Sarker, 12 Jul 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1545', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-1545/egusphere-2026-1545-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Md. Shahoriar Sarker, 12 Jul 2026
We would like to thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We sincerely appreciate the valuable comments and suggestions, which have helped improve the quality and clarity of our work. Our detailed point-by-point responses are provided in the attached PDF.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Md. Shahoriar Sarker, 12 Jul 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 253 | 55 | 31 | 339 | 25 | 26 |
- HTML: 253
- PDF: 55
- XML: 31
- Total: 339
- BibTeX: 25
- EndNote: 26
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
How is the study different from the previous studies that have been conducted here?