the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Estimation of Nocturnal Boundary Layer Height in the Central Amazon, Supported by Gas Concentration Profiles
Abstract. The height of the nocturnal boundary layer (hn) is a fundamental parameter for weather and climate prediction. However, because turbulent processes weaken at night, estimating hn remains challenging. In addition, our understanding of its variability is limited, especially due to the predominant use of indirect methods that do not always accurately reflect the physical definition of the boundary layer. In this study we used micrometeorological measurements collected at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory, in central Amazon. These measurements enable the study of turbulent sensible heat flux (H) profiles from the canopy top up to 300 m above ground, from which hn can be defined. Our analysis focused on the seasonal differences between dry and wet periods for a La Nina year and an El Nino year. also, we explore how variations in hn affect the vertical distribution of CO and CH4 concentrations. The results revealed significant variations, such as: largest values of hn were observed during the wet season of a year marked by the La Niña phenomenon (~ 270 m +/- 40 m), while smallest values of hn occurred in the dry season associated with El Niño (~ 100 m +/- 27 m). It was also observed that hn can act as a "barrier" to the entry or exit of air masses with high concentrations of CO and CH4. This study provides important insights into the variability of hn above the Amazon forest, with implications for improving parameterizations in atmospheric models.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(13720 KB)
-
Supplement
(2175 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(13720 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2175 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6531', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Jan 2026
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Carla Souza, 28 Jan 2026
Dear Reviewer and Editor,
We would like to thank the reviewer for their careful evaluation of our manuscript and constructive comments.
We would like to emphasize that all the points raised by the reviewer are feasible with the experimental data set available at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO). Some of this data has already been used in the manuscript, and the suggestions made by the reviewer can easily be addressed in the manuscript revision process.
We agree that incorporating a more detailed discussion (going a little deeper than what is already in the current version of the manuscript) on stability, radiative cooling, turbulence, canopy effects, and background trace gas conditions will improve the physical interpretation of the Amazonian nighttime boundary layer. This deeper discussion of the results will certainly be included during the manuscript review process.
Sincerely,
Carla Souza and Cléo Quaresma
on behalf of all co-authorsCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6531-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Cléo Quaresma Dias-Junior, 29 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6531/egusphere-2025-6531-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Carla Souza, 28 Jan 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6531', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Mar 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6531/egusphere-2025-6531-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Cléo Quaresma Dias-Junior, 29 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6531/egusphere-2025-6531-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Cléo Quaresma Dias-Junior, 29 May 2026
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6531', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Jan 2026
The manuscript adresses a interesting topic; however, more in-depth research into the physics and in-canopy processes is required (See review).
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Carla Souza, 28 Jan 2026
Dear Reviewer and Editor,
We would like to thank the reviewer for their careful evaluation of our manuscript and constructive comments.
We would like to emphasize that all the points raised by the reviewer are feasible with the experimental data set available at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO). Some of this data has already been used in the manuscript, and the suggestions made by the reviewer can easily be addressed in the manuscript revision process.
We agree that incorporating a more detailed discussion (going a little deeper than what is already in the current version of the manuscript) on stability, radiative cooling, turbulence, canopy effects, and background trace gas conditions will improve the physical interpretation of the Amazonian nighttime boundary layer. This deeper discussion of the results will certainly be included during the manuscript review process.
Sincerely,
Carla Souza and Cléo Quaresma
on behalf of all co-authorsCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6531-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Cléo Quaresma Dias-Junior, 29 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6531/egusphere-2025-6531-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Carla Souza, 28 Jan 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6531', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Mar 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6531/egusphere-2025-6531-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Cléo Quaresma Dias-Junior, 29 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6531/egusphere-2025-6531-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Cléo Quaresma Dias-Junior, 29 May 2026
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,401 | 951 | 131 | 2,483 | 244 | 111 | 166 |
- HTML: 1,401
- PDF: 951
- XML: 131
- Total: 2,483
- Supplement: 244
- BibTeX: 111
- EndNote: 166
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Carla Souza
Anne C. S. Mendonça
Hella Van Asperen
Flávio A. D’Oliveira
Santiago Botía
Luís G. N. Martins
Denisi H. Hall
Raoni A. Santana
Gilberto Fisch
Leonardo R. Oliveira
Jailson R. Mata
Ranyelli Figueiredo
Bruno T. T. Portela
Carlos A. Quesada
Cléo Q. Dias-Júnior
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(13720 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2175 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
The manuscript adresses a interesting topic; however, more in-depth research into the physics and in-canopy processes is required (See review).