Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6298
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6298
12 Jan 2026
 | 12 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).

How well can we forecast local magnetic ground perturbations with existing space weather monitoring resources?

Stephen Omondi, Spencer Mark Hatch, Andreas Kvammen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Mathew J. Owens, Kristian Solheim Thinn, and Rodrigo López

Abstract. In this study we examine how a deep-learning based forecast of local, ground-based geomagnetic field variations trained on solar wind parameters available in real time might be improved by including information contained in an accurate forecast of solar wind conditions. This is accomplished using a long short-term memory (LSTM) model together with magnetic field measurements made at the Rørvik magnetometer station in Mid-Norway. We use Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) satellite measurements of solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions at the first Sun-Earth Lagrange point, and historical lists of coronal mass ejection (CME) impacts at Earth to train and validate the LSTM model. We find that accurate information about the IMF Bz component and solar wind speed are important for obtaining a reasonably accurate (r² ≥ 0.5) forecast of local geomagnetic activity over forecasting horizons beyond ~ 3 h. Information about CME arrival time is only important when simultaneously accompanied by accurate, relatively high-resolution information about IMF Bz. In the absence of the latter, CME arrival time information does not contribute to model performance. This empirical result amounts to a quantitative demonstration of the widely recognized impact of IMF orientation on CME geoeffectiveness. This result also highlights that new innovations, probably in the form of new prediction capabilities of conditions in interplanetary space, will be required to produce accurate forecasts of local geomagnetic disturbances beyond a forecast horizon of 1 h.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Stephen Omondi, Spencer Mark Hatch, Andreas Kvammen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Mathew J. Owens, Kristian Solheim Thinn, and Rodrigo López

Status: open (until 23 Feb 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Stephen Omondi, Spencer Mark Hatch, Andreas Kvammen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Mathew J. Owens, Kristian Solheim Thinn, and Rodrigo López
Stephen Omondi, Spencer Mark Hatch, Andreas Kvammen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Mathew J. Owens, Kristian Solheim Thinn, and Rodrigo López
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 12 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Researchers tested whether combining real-time solar wind data with forecasts can improve predictions of local geomagnetic activity in Norway. Using a machine learning model, they found that accurate solar wind speed and magnetic field direction are key for reliable forecasts over 3 hours ahead, while CME arrival time only helps if magnetic field data is precise.
Share