the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How well can we forecast local magnetic ground perturbations with existing space weather monitoring resources?
Abstract. In this study we examine how a deep-learning based forecast of local, ground-based geomagnetic field variations trained on solar wind parameters available in real time might be improved by including information contained in an accurate forecast of solar wind conditions. This is accomplished using a long short-term memory (LSTM) model together with magnetic field measurements made at the Rørvik magnetometer station in Mid-Norway. We use Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) satellite measurements of solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions at the first Sun-Earth Lagrange point, and historical lists of coronal mass ejection (CME) impacts at Earth to train and validate the LSTM model. We find that accurate information about the IMF Bz component and solar wind speed are important for obtaining a reasonably accurate (r² ≥ 0.5) forecast of local geomagnetic activity over forecasting horizons beyond ~ 3 h. Information about CME arrival time is only important when simultaneously accompanied by accurate, relatively high-resolution information about IMF Bz. In the absence of the latter, CME arrival time information does not contribute to model performance. This empirical result amounts to a quantitative demonstration of the widely recognized impact of IMF orientation on CME geoeffectiveness. This result also highlights that new innovations, probably in the form of new prediction capabilities of conditions in interplanetary space, will be required to produce accurate forecasts of local geomagnetic disturbances beyond a forecast horizon of 1 h.
- Preprint
(10925 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6298', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Feb 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6298/egusphere-2025-6298-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-6298-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6298', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Feb 2026
In this paper, entitled "How well can we forecast local magnetic ground perturbations with existing space weather monitoring resources?" the authors use data from a ground-based observatory located in Norway, along with solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field data to train and validate the long short-term memory (LSTM) models. For some cases, they also use CME arrival times. I find their study to be an interesting contribution to space weather forecasting and recommend publication after minor revisions.
Below, I provide my suggestions regarding minor issues:
line 9: consider deleting "simultaneously" - accompanied already implies something occurring together
line 16: "solar wind speed" --> "solar wind speed v" (I suggest defining solar wind speed at this point - first mention - and use only the abbreviation "v" to the rest of the manuscript
line 43: coronal mass ejection (CME) --> CME (already defined in line 18)
line 52: interplanetary magnetic field --> IMF (already defined in line 17)
lines 62-63: (Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE), 2025) --> Is there a reference or link missing here?
line 66: after "Statnett" add something like "system operator of the Norwegian power system", as the reader might not be aware of who Statnett is
line 68: "Viljanen et al. (2021)" --> "(Viljanen et al., 2021)"
lines 71-72: please consider clarifying a little bit on "first-order backward differencing" - this term is not familiar to all readers
line 81: "the power in other in contributions" --> "the contributions"
line 95: "dipole tilt ψ" --> "dipole tilt angle ψ"
line 95 and Figure 2: in text it reads as "By and Bz". In panel b it is "Bz" and in panel c "By". In the caption it reads that By is in panel (b) and Bz in panel (c). Please check if it is "By" and "Bz" or the other way around and revise accordingly so that everywhere (text, panels, caption) they appear in the same (correct) order.
line 97: "with a standard deviation of ∼5–6 h around the time of CME impact" --> how was this time interval chosen?
line 101: "blue lines and orange lines" --> "blue and orange lines"
line 128: "(In this..." --> "(in this..."
line 144: "Akiba et al. (2019)" --> "(Akiba et al., 2019)"
line 145: Please consider clarifying the term "patience value" for a broader scientific audience
line 150: "Kingma (2014)" --> "(Kingma, 2014)"
line 161: "Girosi et al. (1995)" --> "(Girosi et al., 1995)"
line 164: "dropout method" --> Please add reference
line 185: "Given that h = w & n = 0,1,2, ...,w and h" --> "Given that h = w, n = 0,1,2, ...,w and h"
lines 190-192: Please consider rephrasing/ splitting into shorter and more concise sentences, as it is pretty hard to follow
line 205: "Here we are however interested in dynamic learning" --> "Here, however, we are interested in dynamic learning"
lines 213-217: Please revise for clarity (e.g. “fixed” appears multiple times) - Also, the last sentence seems to be redundant
line 222: "Hyperopt(Bergstra et al., 2015)" --> "Hyperopt (Bergstra et al., 2015)"
lines 223-226: Please revise for clarity (and grammar)
line 233: "Sampler" --> "sampler"
line 243: Please add reference for "Gini importance"
line 249" Please clarify "watching capability"
line 259: "November 3-4" --> "November 3-4, 2021"
line 259: "measured values of P0" --> Is P0 actually measured or derived from magnetometer measurements of the geomagnetic field? The same question also applies to line 271 "observed P0"
line 309: "dominate" --> "dominates"
line 311: "lesser but nevertheless" --> "smaller, yet still"
lines 312, 361, 363, 401: "solar wind speed v" --> "v"
line 320: Please define here MCC, which is now defined later in line 330
line 333: Please revise this: "forecasting ?e.g.,>[]Hu2024,Baily2021SW"
Caption of Table 3: Please make sure to include also TP, TN, FP and FN
line 360: "shows" --> "show"
line 358: Please consider making this sentence more clear and precise
Caption of Figure 5: "...In each panel The observed..." --> "...In each panel the observed..."
Captions of Figures 6 and 7: "Measured dH/dt" --> Is it actually measured or calculated? (see also previous comment for line 259)Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6298-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 158 | 63 | 20 | 241 | 16 | 17 |
- HTML: 158
- PDF: 63
- XML: 20
- Total: 241
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1