the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Spectral Nudging Impacts on Precipitation Downscaling in the Conformal Cubic Atmospheric Model, version CCAM-2504: Insights from Summer 2011
Abstract. This study evaluates the impacts of spectral nudging on rainfall when dynamically downscaling with the Conformal Cubic Atmospheric Model (CCAM). The study focuses on the extreme 2010 – 11 La Niña, in conjunction with the Madden – Julian Oscillation (MJO), across the CORDEX – Australasia domain at 12.5 km with CCAM nested in ERA-5 reanalysis. Sixteen simulations were performed, systematically varying nudging wavelength, vertical extent, frequency, and variable choice, and evaluated against GPM-IMERG precipitation and ERA5 reanalysis. Configurations at short nudging wavelengths (∼500 – 1500 km), with high-frequency updates (1 h), and including pressure, wind and temperature delivered the most robust performance. These setups reduced large-scale rainfall biases, improved spatial and temporal correlations, reproduced vertical structure and moisture convergence more realistically, and achieved the closest agreement with observed mean and extreme observed rainfall. In contrast, coarse-scale (3000 km), full-column constraints, or nudging limited to pressure or wind variables degraded performance, producing oversmoothed variability, misplaced convection, and unrealistic rainfall patterns. Overall, the results demonstrate that carefully tuned spectral nudging enhances the fidelity of both mean and extreme rainfall in CCAM, while preserving large-scale teleconnections associated with La Niña, MJO, and retaining mesoscale variability. This study strengthens confidence in CCAM downscaling for CORDEX – Australasia, with implications extending to other CORDEX domains and applications.
- Preprint
(4654 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1326 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 09 Apr 2026)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5847', Peter B Gibson, 19 Feb 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-5847/egusphere-2025-5847-CC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-5847-CC1 -
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5847 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 13 Mar 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
You have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other long-term archival and publishing alternatives, such as Zenodo. In addition, to access the data necessary to replicate your work you link several servers that do not fulfil GMD’s requirements for a persistent data archive, in some cases they are generic portals, not the specific data. The sites that you cite do not comply with our policy because:
- They do not appear to have a published policy for data preservation over many years or decades (some flexibility exists over the precise length of preservation, but the policy must exist).
- They do not appear to have a published mechanism for preventing authors from unilaterally removing material. Archives must have a policy which makes removal of materials only possible in exceptional circumstances and subject to an independent curatorial decision,If we have missed a published policy which does in fact address this matter satisfactorily, please post a response linking to it. If you have any questions about this issue, please post them in a reply.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under Discussion that do not comply with our policy. Therefore, your manuscript should have not been accepted for Discussions and peer-review in the journal, and the current situation is irregular.
Please, remember that the 'Code and Data Availability’ section must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5847-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Son C. H. Truong, 15 Mar 2026
reply
March 15, 2026
Professor. Juan A. Añel
Geoscientific Model Development Executive EditorDear Prof. Añel,
Thank you for your comments regarding the Code and Data Policy. We have updated our manuscript to ensure full compliance. Specifically:
- The CCAM model code (version CCAM-2504), including post-processing scripts and running scripts, is now archived in Zenodo with a persistent DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19018138.
- All datasets referenced in the manuscript now link to persistent data archives with DOIs:
- ERA5 hourly data: https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6
- GPCP daily CDR v3.2: https://doi.org/10.5067/MEASURES/GPCP/DATA305
- CMORPH v1.0 CRT: https://doi.org/10.25921/w9va-q159
- IMERG Final Run product (Version 07): https://doi.org/10.5067/GPM/IMERGDF/DAY/06
- All Python scripts used to generate figures are archived at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18423588.
The manuscript’s “Code and Data Availability” section has been revised accordingly, and all dataset references are cited with persistent identifiers. The revised manuscript and its associated track-change version have been sent to editor@mailarchive.copernicus.org and Polina Shvedko polina.shvedko@copernicus.org. The updated “Code and Data Availability” section is included below:
Code and data availability
The CCAM model code used in this study, including the main CCAM code (version CCAM-2504), post-processing scripts, and running scripts, is archived at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19018138. The ERA5 hourly data from 1940 to present can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6 (Hersbach et al., 2023). The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) daily CDR v3.2 (Huffman et al., 2023) can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.5067/MEASURES/GPCP/DATA305. The Climate Prediction Center morphing method (CMORPH) v1.0 CRT (Joyce et al., 2004; Xie et al., 2017) can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.25921/w9va-q159. The Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement IMERG Final Run product (Version 07; Huffman et al., 2019), distributed by NASA GES DISC can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.5067/GPM/IMERGDF/DAY/06. All figures presented in this manuscript were generated using Python scripts, which are publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18423588. All references of the datasets are listed in the in-text data citation references.
We believe these updates fully address the journal’s Code and Data Policy requirements. Thank you for your consideration.
Best regards,
Truong Cong Hoang SonThe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 16 Mar 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Many thanks for your reply. However, it does not fully solve the issues raised in my previous commentary. For your work you use ERA5, GPCP, the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement IMERG Final Run product, and CMORPH) v1.0 CRT. However, you have not stored the data used. To get access to them you provide links to webpages that are not trusted long term repositories that we can accept, and moreover, they are generic links to full datasets, not the specific data you have used. Therefore, as requested in the previous comment, store the specific data that you have used properly, and reply to this comment with a modified Code and Data Availability section that we can accept.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5847-CEC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Son C. H. Truong, 18 Mar 2026
reply
Subject: Revised Code and Data Availability Section (Response to GMD Editor)
Dear Prof. Añel,
Thank you for your feedback and patience. As requested, we have updated the Code and Data Availability section of the manuscript to fully address the concerns raised in your previous comment. We have now archived the datasets used in our analysis (ERA5, GPCP, CMORPH, and IMERG precipitation data) at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19077484. The updated Code and Data Availability section has been revised accordingly and is included below for your review:
Code and Data Availability
The CCAM model code used in this study, including the main CCAM code (version CCAM-2504), post-processing scripts, and running scripts, is archived at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19018138. The observational and reanalysis datasets used in this study (ERA5, GPCP, CMORPH, and IMERG precipitation data) is archived at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19077484. Original datasets remain available from their providers: ERA5 (Hersbach et al., 2023): https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6; GPCP (Huffman et al., 2023): https://doi.org/10.5067/MEASURES/GPCP/DATA305; CMORPH (Joyce et al., 2004; Xie et al., 2017): https://doi.org/10.25921/w9va-q159; IMERG (Huffman et al., 2019): https://doi.org/10.5067/GPM/IMERGDF/DAY/06. All figures presented in this manuscript were generated using Python scripts, which are publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18423588. All references of the datasets are listed in the in-text data citation references
We hope these changes fully meet your requirements for reproducibility and compliance with the journal’s Code and Data Policy. Please let us know if there are any further issues or if any additional modifications are needed. Thank you again for your guidance and support throughout this process.
Kind regards,
Son C. H. Truong
On behalf of all authorsMarch 18, 2026
-
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 18 Mar 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Many thanks for your reply. We can consider now the current version of your manuscript in compliance with the Code and Data policy of the journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5847-CEC3
-
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 18 Mar 2026
reply
-
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Son C. H. Truong, 18 Mar 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Son C. H. Truong, 15 Mar 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 219 | 61 | 28 | 308 | 53 | 15 | 31 |
- HTML: 219
- PDF: 61
- XML: 28
- Total: 308
- Supplement: 53
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 31
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1