Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5739
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5739
04 Jan 2026
 | 04 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Incorporating observed fire severity in refined emissions estimates for boreal and temperate forest fires in the carbon budget model CBM-CFS3 v1.2

Dan K. Thompson, Ellen Whitman, Mark Hafer, Oleksandra Hararuk, Chelene Hanes, Vinicius Manvailer Goncalves, and Ben Hudson

Abstract. Among the many natural disturbances that affect Canada's boreal and temperate forest biomes, wildfire has the greatest impact on forest productivity, landscape structure, timber supply and greenhouse gas emissions. Fire severity represents the fate of biomass, partitioning survival, consumption, and mortality without consumption. Currently, the impact of fire on carbon stocks is limited to a single parametrization of fire severity that assumes only high severity fires, despite evidence of widespread mixed-severity fires. This paper describes a sub-model, termed FireDMs (Fire Disturbance Matrix: severity), of the National Forest Carbon Monitoring Accounting and Reporting System for Canada (NFCMARS). In this sub-model, field measurements of biomass consumption are related to satellite-derived burn severity maps and are interpreted from a fire physics and ecology perspective to derive estimates of the forest greenhouse gas emissions in the immediate aftermath of fires. The sub-model also quantifies fire-killed but uncombusted biomass as a set of distinct pools. Model outputs indicate total direct carbon emissions range from a 11 t C/ha in Boreal Shield West forests of Saskatchewan following low severity fire to over 60 t C/ha in Pacific Maritime forests of British Columbia under high severity fire. The existing approach to emissions in NFC-MARS yields regional CO2e emissions that are 10 to 25 percent higher than this new method, owing to lower overall canopy consumption with mixed-severity fires, which is only partially offset by increased estimates of forest floor consumption in this new approach. Comparisons against directly observed fire plume emissions ratios as well as against annualized carbon emissions for Canada's 2023 fire season show good model agreement with observations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Dan K. Thompson, Ellen Whitman, Mark Hafer, Oleksandra Hararuk, Chelene Hanes, Vinicius Manvailer Goncalves, and Ben Hudson

Status: open (until 01 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Dan K. Thompson, Ellen Whitman, Mark Hafer, Oleksandra Hararuk, Chelene Hanes, Vinicius Manvailer Goncalves, and Ben Hudson

Data sets

RMarkdown source code and data inputs to FireDMs Dan K. Thompson and Ellen Whitman https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17517166

Model code and software

RMarkdown source code and data inputs to FireDMs Dan K. Thompson and Ellen Whitman https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17517166

Dan K. Thompson, Ellen Whitman, Mark Hafer, Oleksandra Hararuk, Chelene Hanes, Vinicius Manvailer Goncalves, and Ben Hudson

Viewed

Total article views: 191 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
128 55 8 191 36 9 9
  • HTML: 128
  • PDF: 55
  • XML: 8
  • Total: 191
  • Supplement: 36
  • BibTeX: 9
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jan 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jan 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 175 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 175 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Emissions from forest fires are tallied in Canada's National Forest Carbon Monitoring Accounting and Reporting System. Mapped fire extents and regional carbon stock estimates are used, but a fixed and high fire severity is assumed. This paper calculates fire emissions based on mapped fire severity. Using mapped fire severity, emissions are 10 to 20% higher, with more variation in emissions per hectare. This new method compares well against independent measurements for the 2023 fires in Canada.
Share