SNOWstorm (v1.0) – a deep-learning based model for near-surface winds and drifting snow in mountain environments
Abstract. Wind-driven redistribution of snow and resulting heterogeneous snow accumulation poses a major uncertainty in mountain hydrology and distributed glacier mass balance models as it is often neglected. High-quality information on the fine-scale wind structure is crucial to predict snow redistribution, but past approaches either relied on highly simplified assumptions or on computationally expensive numerical simulations, inhibiting the application for long-term studies.
To bridge this gap, we introduce SNOWstorm – the snow drift sublimation and transport model. It is designed as a deep-learning based emulator model, that is trained on data from high-resolution (∆x = 50 m) numerical simulations in semi-idealized conditions, to be applicable over a wide range of atmospheric conditions and for a wide range of mountain regions. The model can be driven with input of standard atmospheric variables from coarse- to meso-scale numerical models and predicts near-surface wind fields, and rates of wind-driven snow mass change, drifting snow sublimation and snow transport. Validation experiments show that the model reproduces major terrain-induced flow features as well as patterns of snow redistribution. In a first real-world application study in the European Alps, SNOWstorm predicts wind fields and drifting snow patterns comparable to nested numerical large-eddy simulations, though at more than five orders of magnitude less computational expense. The model thus shows the potential to be used in future studies on multi-seasonal influence of snow redistribution on glacier mass balance in various climatic settings.
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
First, for your study you have used the model WRF and WRFlux, version 1.3.2. However, you do not provide in the Code and Data Availability section of your manuscript a repository for them. Also, for part of the data necessary to replicate your work, you link a web page of the university of Innsbruck, which we can not accept. The data must be stored in a permanent repository which complies with the policy of the journal.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
The 'Code and Data Availability’ section must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor