Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5541
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5541
05 Feb 2026
 | 05 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Retrieval of ultra-violet aerosol absorption from radiation measurements in young wildfire plumes

Jan-Lukas Tirpitz, Nathaniel Brockway, Santo Fedele Colosimo, Robert Spurr, Matt Christi, Samuel Hall, Kirk Ullmann, Vijay Natraj, Nicolas Theys, Johnathan Hair, Taylor Shingler, Rodney Weber, Ruchen Zhu, Jack Dibb, Richard Moore, Elizabeth Wiggins, and Jochen Stutz

Abstract. Aerosols play an important role for atmospheric radiative transfer in biomass burning (BB) plumes, where they control photochemistry, direct radiative forcing, and radiation-induced atmospheric dynamics. The optical properties of BB aerosol, however, remain poorly constrained, with respect to their absorptive properties at ultraviolet and visible wavelengths. In-situ observations show considerable variability due to heterogeneity in BB plumes, and different measurement methods do not agree with each other. To overcome this challenge, we have developed an algorithm based on the VLIDORT for photochemistry (VPC) radiative transfer model to retrieve the imaginary refractive index k(λ) from airborne actinic flux observations at wavelengths λ of 310–440 nm. Using three flights from NASA/NOAA’s Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX-AQ) airborne experiment, we obtain values k(387 nm) between 0.02 and 0.03 for different transects, while the absorption Angstrom exponent αk is 4±1. Volume absorption cross section (VAC) and single scattering albedo generally agree with in situ observations, but show less variability, most likely because of the inherent spatial averaging of our observations. k(λ), VAC and single-scattering co-albedo decrease with physical plume age, with half-lives τ1/2 of 13±3, 16±4 and 17±4 hours, respectively. Based on our observations, we present a parameterization of the absorptive properties of BB aerosol from western US wildfires as a function of wavelength and plume age, which will help to improve the representation of BB aerosol in models.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jan-Lukas Tirpitz, Nathaniel Brockway, Santo Fedele Colosimo, Robert Spurr, Matt Christi, Samuel Hall, Kirk Ullmann, Vijay Natraj, Nicolas Theys, Johnathan Hair, Taylor Shingler, Rodney Weber, Ruchen Zhu, Jack Dibb, Richard Moore, Elizabeth Wiggins, and Jochen Stutz

Status: open (until 19 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jan-Lukas Tirpitz, Nathaniel Brockway, Santo Fedele Colosimo, Robert Spurr, Matt Christi, Samuel Hall, Kirk Ullmann, Vijay Natraj, Nicolas Theys, Johnathan Hair, Taylor Shingler, Rodney Weber, Ruchen Zhu, Jack Dibb, Richard Moore, Elizabeth Wiggins, and Jochen Stutz
Jan-Lukas Tirpitz, Nathaniel Brockway, Santo Fedele Colosimo, Robert Spurr, Matt Christi, Samuel Hall, Kirk Ullmann, Vijay Natraj, Nicolas Theys, Johnathan Hair, Taylor Shingler, Rodney Weber, Ruchen Zhu, Jack Dibb, Richard Moore, Elizabeth Wiggins, and Jochen Stutz
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 05 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
This study applies a novel remote sensing algorithm to airborne radiation measurements performed in wildfire plumes, to retrieve the absorptive properties of biomass burning aerosols. The results provide new insights on the magnitude, wavelength dependence, and atmospheric aging of the imaginary refractive index, volume absorption cross-section, and single scattering albedo of the smoke particles. Furthermore, potential and limitations of the applied method are discussed.
Share