the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Simulated evidence for ice over 1 Ma in the Dome A region, East Antarctica
Abstract. The search for Antarctic ice-core records older than 1 Ma is crucial for advancing our understanding of global climate change. However, basal melting and complex internal deformation within the Antarctic Ice Sheet make it extremely challenging to obtain continuous ice core records exceeding 1 Ma. In this study, we integrate ice core observations, radar transect constraints, and a pseudo steady state modeling framework to construct a high precision age model and evaluate the age of old ice in the Dome A region. Our simulations indicate extremely low basal melting (0.14 mm/yr) at Kunlun Station, and a maximum ice age of 1737 ± 223 ka, corresponding to low age density of 8.2 kyr/m. Considering the presence of basal melting, we adopt the age at 200 m above the bedrock as the maximum ice age, which yields an age 909 ± 113 ka and age density of 2.5 kyr/m, which is far lower than the maximum age density of 20 kyr/m required for high resolution climate reconstructions. Finally, we identify three potential locations where ice older than 1 Ma may be preserved, with the area north of Kunlun Station exhibiting both older ice and higher age density. This work demonstrates the generality and transferability of the Isoinv1D model, providing important support for Chinese deep ice core drilling program at Dome A and accelerating the IPICS effort to locate and recover million-year-old ice.
- Preprint
(1554 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5165', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Feb 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-5165/egusphere-2025-5165-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-5165-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5165', Brice Van Liefferinge, 25 Feb 2026
Dear authors,
I appreciated reading your paper on simulated evidence for ice over 1 Ma in the Dome A region, East Antarctica. This paper provides inputs on the search for the oldest-ice quest ; as we know multiple drilling sites are needed to resolve the puzzle: Dome C, Dome F, South Pole, ... and Dome A are potential candidates. This paper is an increment in the research even if it is not adding a lot of new knowledge since Zhao et al. (2018), the use of radar transect constraints in addition to the 1D model results to delineate promising oldest ice sites is interesting as an approach.
I would suggest the following general and major changes:
- The GHF parameter, even if not used in the specific 1D model, has to be introduced and discussed, especially since it is used in Zhao et al (2018), this reference being widely used in this manuscript (e.g. figure 7).
- The use of the SMB parameter of Vostok has to be clarified, I still don't understand why you use it.
- The comparaison with Zhao et al (2018) should be more explicit and quantified: e.g overlap maps, ...
- All figures need to be revised for clarity (see attached pdf). And in particular; it would be much more interesting to zoom into the area of interest. Locations mentioned in general are too vague in the text, make sure to highlight them on figures as well.
- The discussion should include a comparison with other oldest ice sites where we already have studies, data, and in particular Dome C, Dome F.
I attach a detailed point-by-point review of the paper.
Best,
Brice Van Liefferinge
Data sets
isoinv1D model output at DomeA Dong Li https://zenodo.org/records/17383904
Model code and software
isoinv1D model Ailsa Chung https://zenodo.org/records/8189792
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167 | 117 | 16 | 300 | 15 | 15 |
- HTML: 167
- PDF: 117
- XML: 16
- Total: 300
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1