the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Emissions from fuel combustion by stoves in residential kitchens in São Paulo – Brazil
Abstract. This study investigates greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and indoor air quality associated with residential cooking practices in São Paulo, Brazil. Measurements were conducted in 30 households, focusing on kitchens using natural gas (NG) or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stoves. A measurement protocol was developed to assess emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrogen oxides (NOx) under different operational conditions. Emission rates and factors were calculated using 5 mass balance approaches, considering kitchen volume, air exchange rates, and gas concentrations. The results show different behavior for the type of fuel, especially for methane, which has a significant response to the use of NG, unlike LPG. It was also possible to observe a difference between the temporal variability cycles, as the burners responded quickly to the increase in concentration, while the oven showed a delayed increase observed in the environment. There was a high variability in the concentrations in the different residences, which may be associated with factors such as the age of the stove, model, leak 10 and internal influence. The emission factors obtained were three times higher than the IPCC considering only the close values, but when considering the outliers it is up to 10 times higher for CH4 in the case of NG. For CO2 the factor obtained was lower than the IPCC. The findings highlight the importance of considering fuel type in evaluating GHG emissions from residential cooking and the need for robust data on residential emissions in Brazil.
- Preprint
(1364 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(54 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 07 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-968', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Apr 2025
reply
This paper investigates greenhouse gas emissions associated with residential kitchens. The topic is relevant because it analyzes natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas that are widely used in many countries for cooking and can affect human health and ultimately might have climate impacts. Electric stoves may be ideal to minimize emissions, but there are challenges in their implementation in many countries and Brazil can be a typical example. The manuscript is clear and concise, which is really appreciated, and results are clearly illustrated and supported by the data. I have only one concern before recommending the publication in AMT: The authors claim in the text and in the supplementary material that they have measurements from 30 different kitchens. However, the discussion is focused in SP_CASA02 and SP_CASA03. I miss the link between these two examples and a global conclusion that includes measurements in all kitchens. Saying that, are the results of emission rates and emission factors representative of all cases or only of SP_CASA02 and SP_CASA03 ?
MINOR REVISONS
- Introduction: I miss the objectives at the end of the introduction section. This can enrich the manuscript.
- Line 119: Give a reference for US EPA
- Line 120: Give a reference for European Norm (EN)
- Line 125: Give a reference for Integrated Cavity Output Spectroscopy technique.
- Lines 133-135: Give a reference for equation 1.
- Lines 146-147: Can you explain better how air exchange rate was determined?
- Give a reference for equation 2
- Line 158: How did you compute normalized concentration profiles?
- Figure 5a: I recommend reducing y-axis to values of 0.2, even though you miss the outlier in cycle 2. Another recommendation could be reducing to values of 0.3 and including the outlier in cycle 2. Also, Figure 5 caption can be improved.
- Figure 7c: Again, I think that y-axis should be re-scaled to enhance the Box-Whisker plot.
- I recommend joining Discussion and Conclusion in just one section.
- Line 225: Give link/reference to Abregas
- Line 274: Give link/reference to Sistema de Estimativas de Emissoes e Remocoes de Efeito Estufa
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-968-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Tailine Corrêa dos Santos, 17 Apr 2025
reply
Thank you very much for your careful reading and valuable feedback. We appreciate your positive comments regarding the clarity and relevance of the manuscript.
Regarding your concern: SP_CASA02 and SP_CASA03 were selected as illustrative examples to describe the temporal variation in emissions from the two main types of fuel studied (liquefied petroleum gas and natural gas, respectively). These cases were used only in the initial analysis to exemplify the emission dynamics under each fuel type. Similar temporal patterns were observed across the remaining households, which is why we focused on just these two for this part of the discussion.
However, all subsequent analyses — including variability in concentrations, emission rates, and emission factors — were based on data from the full sample of 30 households. We will clarify this point in the revised manuscript to ensure it is clear that the broader results are representative of the complete dataset.
We will also incorporate your minor suggestions directly into the text. Thank you again for your thoughtful review.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-968-AC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79 | 15 | 6 | 100 | 16 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 79
- PDF: 15
- XML: 6
- Total: 100
- Supplement: 16
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1