the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global validation of the Particulate Observing Scanning Polarimeter (POSP) Aerosol Optical Depth products over land
Abstract. The global AODs for the one of few single-angle polarimeters currently in orbit, Particulate Observing Scanning Polarimeter (POSP) has been proposed. We have tested the retrievals from the early stages of on-orbit operation and achieved high accuracy, but we still lack an understanding of the retrieval accuracy over longer time scales. The systematic validation and analysis of POSP retrievals are imperative to ensure the reliability of AOD products and to provide scientific references for further enhancement. To this end, POSP AOD products have been compared with Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) measurements at over 276 sites. The results from 19314 collocations show a high accuracy, with correlation coefficients (R) of 0.914, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.085, and the fraction within the expected error (EE) is 78.5 %. The error analysis shows that the accuracy of POSP AOD exhibits a clear seasonal variation, being lower in the autumn and winter than in the spring and summer. Additionally, the uncertainty in AOD increases as NDVI decreases. Compared with MODIS AOD products, the accuracy of POSP AOD was higher than that of the Deep Blue product except over barren and forest, and higher than the Dark Target product over all surface types. In addition, the spatial variability characteristics of the global mean AOD has been analyzed. POSP AOD shows an underestimation compared to MODIS BD AOD over North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, while it overestimates in other regions. However, both POSP AOD and MODIS AOD indicate that high aerosol loading mainly occurs over northern South America, central Africa, northern India, and northeastern China.
- Preprint
(44238 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(8032 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-91', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Mar 2025
This study conducted a systematic validation of the aerosol optical depth (AOD) products from the Particulate Observing Scanning Polarimeter (POSP) onboard the Gaofen-5 02 satellite, including comparative analyses with AERONET ground-based observations and MODIS products. The research demonstrates reasonable design, sufficient data volume, rigorous statistical methodology, and scientifically valuable results. It is recommended for acceptance after addressing the following revisions:
1. The specific data quality control procedures for POSP (e.g., cloud detection, outlier removal) remain unclear in the manuscript, potentially affecting result reproducibility. It is recommended to supplement detailed descriptions of POSP data preprocessing steps (e.g., cloud masking, pixel screening criteria) and clarify their impacts on the matching strategy.
2. Line24, Lines 178-182: The significant underestimation in high-AOD regions (e.g., North Africa) is attributed to "aerosol model errors" without specific analysis of discrepancies between model assumptions and actual aerosol characteristics. Further investigation into aerosol model classification and its impact on retrieval errors is suggested.
3. Lines 302-304: The explanation for lower AOD accuracy in urban areas remains overly generalized ("complex surface and diverse pollution components"), lacking quantitative analysis (e.g., interference from urban surface reflectance anisotropy). Enhanced discussion on separating urban surface reflectance from aerosol signals is recommended.
4.Line 246:"Other LC types which are not shown in Fig.4 are presented in Fig. S1." Figs. S1-S9 need to be found in the supplementary document. It is recommended to describe clearly in the manuscript.
5.Some grammatical inconsistencies exist. Comprehensive language polishing is advised to ensure proper tense usage and grammatical consistency throughout the manuscript.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-91-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zhe Ji, 18 Apr 2025
I would like to express my gratitude to the editor and reviewers for their invaluable comments, which have been of great value in enhancing the quality of the manuscript content and correcting the author's writing errors due to inadvertence. In response to all the comments, all revisions have been marked in the resubmitted manuscript. We have marked the changes to the original manuscript.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Zhe Ji, 18 Apr 2025
I would like to express my gratitude to the editor and reviewers for their invaluable comments, which have been of great value in enhancing the quality of the manuscript content and correcting the author's writing errors due to inadvertence. In response to all the comments, all revisions have been marked in the resubmitted manuscript. We have marked the changes to the original manuscript.
- AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Zhe Ji, 17 Jul 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zhe Ji, 18 Apr 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-91', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Jun 2025
The manuscript presents a global validation of the POSP AOD product using AERONET and MODIS AOD as reference datasets. While the validation is generally sound, the manuscript could be strengthened by addressing the following points:
1) Given that POSP is a new instrument with a novel retrieval algorithm, more detailed information should be provided on the AOD retrieval methodology, particularly regarding the estimation of surface reflectance over land. Since surface reflectance is a critical factor in satellite AOD retrieval, a lack of clarity on how it is treated limits the reader’s ability to understand regional differences in retrieval performance. Clear articulation of the algorithm's treatment of land surface properties would help explain spatial variations in validation results.
2) The manuscript could benefit from being more concise. Since the primary objective is to validate the POSP AOD product, the content should remain focused on presenting the validation methods, metrics, regional analysis, and interpretation of results, minimizing peripheral discussions.
3) The current validation extends a previous preliminary comparison (Nov 2021 – Apr 2022) by covering a longer period (Dec 2021 – Nov 2022). However, the manuscript should clearly articulate the novel contributions of this extended study. For instance, does the longer time series reveal seasonal biases? Are regional patterns more robustly confirmed or refined? Clarifying what new insights are gained will better justify the value of this work.
4) Cloud screening is especially crucial for POSP given its spatial resolution of 6.4 km. However, the current manuscript lacks sufficient details on the cloud masking procedures employed. Please describe how cloud contamination is identified and removed from the observations, and discuss the potential impact of residual cloud effects on the validation results.
5) The reference to Che (2015) is cited in the manuscript but not listed in the References section. Please ensure this citation is properly included and formatted.
6) The citation “Liangfu et al. (2021)” appears to be incorrect. It should be corrected to “Chen et al. (2021)” as per standard citation format.
7) L85-90, Relying on the high-..., it should be polished.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-91-RC2 - AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Zhe Ji, 17 Jul 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
321 | 69 | 24 | 414 | 35 | 20 | 44 |
- HTML: 321
- PDF: 69
- XML: 24
- Total: 414
- Supplement: 35
- BibTeX: 20
- EndNote: 44
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1