the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Rainfall recharge thresholds decrease after an intense fire over a near-surface cave at Wombeyan, Australia
Abstract. Quantifying the amount of rainfall needed to generate groundwater recharge is important for the sustainable management of groundwater resources. Here, we quantify rainfall recharge thresholds using drip loggers situated in a near-surface cave: Wildman’s cave at Wombeyan, southeast Australia. In just over two years of monitoring, 42 potential recharge events were identified in the cave, approximately 4 m below land surface which comprises a 30° slope with 37 % bare rock. Recharge events occurred within 48 hours of rainfall. Using daily precipitation data, the median 48 h rainfall needed to generate recharge was 19.8 mm, without clear seasonal variability. An intense experimental fire experiment was conducted 18 months into the monitoring period: the median 48 h rainfall needed to generate recharge was 22.1 mm before the fire (n=22) and 16.4 mm after the fire (n=20), with the decrease in rainfall recharge most noticeable starting three months after the fire.. Rainfall recharge thresholds and number of potential recharge events at Wildman’s Cave are consistent with those published from other caves in water-limited Australia. At Wildman’s Cave, we infer that soil water storage, combined with the generation of overland flow over bare limestone surfaces is the pathway for water movement to the subsurface via fractures and that these determine the rainfall recharge threshold. Immediately after the fire, surface ash deposits initially retard overland flow, and after ash removal from the land surface, soil loss and damage decrease the available soil water storage capacity, leading to more efficient infiltration and a decreased rainfall recharge threshold.
- Preprint
(1672 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 11 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-84', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Mar 2025
reply
Water resource, circulation and infiltration, are essential for the regional ecosystem and society. This is an interesting work, focused on the changes of recharge threshold pre-post fire in a karst area of Australia. The authors monitoring the precipitation and discharge in cave, analyzed the data and compared the changes in recharge thresholds. The research design is simple and clear, and the data analysis is comprehensive and reasonable. The authors also pointed out some potential problems and imperfections. In general, I think this is an interesting and good manuscript. I can't pick on more and I recommend it to be published.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-84-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Andy Baker, 22 Apr 2025
reply
We thank the reviewer for their positive feedback on our preprint.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-84-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Andy Baker, 22 Apr 2025
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-84', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Apr 2025
reply
Review comments on the manuscript: Rainfall recharge thresholds decrease after an intense fire over a near-surface cave at Wombeyan, Australia by Song et al.
The manuscript presents an interesting study on the impact of (wild)fires on groundwater recharge. The authors compare post- and pre-fire rainfall recharge thresholds using time series from drip loggers situated in a karst cave in Australia. The topic is timely and relevant. The manuscript is well written and structured, and I recommend it for publication after minor revisions.
Main Comments
Most of the figures—especially Figure 1—are visually unappealing and difficult to interpret:
• Figure 1a, 1b, and 1c are too small and blurry to discern the details referred to in the caption or main text - L204: “The decrease in rainfall recharge threshold is not observed immediately post-fire, when the land surface above the cave was covered with thick ash deposits (see Fig. 1). Our observations at the site showed a thick and widespread ash cover immediately post fire (Fig.1)” — this statement cannot be supported by the current quality of Figure 1.
• Figure 1b is too dark, and the meaning of the different bounds of the Wombeyan Karst Reserve is unclear. Are these administrative, geological, or hydrological? This is important to clarify.
• Figure 1d: Consider whether the information content justifies its current size.I strongly recommend revising and improving Figure 1.
Figure 2:
There is an inconsistency in the time span: the axis text states 1961–1990, while the figure caption refers to 1961–1991. Please clarify.Figure 4b:
• Please include a description of the line in the caption—why is there only one line?
• Indicate clearly which number represent which period. You could use red to highlight the post-fire period, consistent with Figure 4a.
• Why were both periods plotted together in one panel, unlike Figure 6, where they are shown separately?Discussion: While the concise writing style is appreciated, the manuscript would benefit from a broader contextualization of the results. I would like to have a broader discussion of the results and on the implications of fire impacts on the hydrological cycle, an area of increasing interest, see e.g. Guzmán-Rojo et al. (2024) or Moazeni and Artemi (2024).
Secondary CommentsL19: Remove one period.
L43: Balfour et al., 2014
L68: The whole cave is less than 4 m depth below land surface -> 4 m deep or rephrase
L97: Remove one period.
L111: pre-fire
Table 1 caption: Consider using a symbol (e.g. an asterisk) instead of italics to improve readability.
Table 2 caption: Climate (Köppen-Geiger)References:
Guzmán-Rojo, M., Fernandez, J., d’Abzac, P., & Huysmans, M. (2024). Impacts of Wildfires on Groundwater Recharge: A Comprehensive Analysis of Processes, Methodological Challenges, and Research Opportunities. Water, 16(18), https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182562.
Moazeni, S., and Cerdà, A. (2024). The impacts of forest fires on watershed hydrological response. A review, Trees, Forests and People, Volume 18, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100707.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-84-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Andy Baker, 22 Apr 2025
reply
We thank the reviewer for their comments. Our reply is in the pdf file.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Andy Baker, 22 Apr 2025
reply
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-84', Bryce Belanger, 23 Apr 2025
reply
Reviewer comments on manuscript: Rainfall recharge thresholds decrease after an intense fire over a near-surface cave at Wombeyan, Australia
In this manuscript, Song et al. present a valuable dataset and evaluation of rainfall recharge thresholds pre and post fire in a water-limited region of Australia. The authors incorporate precipitation data from a local meteorological station (supplemented by gridded data from the Australian Water Outlook website) and drip rate data from in-cave Stalagmate drip loggers to quantify pre and post-fire recharge thresholds. They also present a conceptual model to describe the patterns observed. Overall, this is a well-written manuscript and a valuable dataset. This manuscript will benefit from an expanded discussion and refinement of figures. I recommend this manuscript for publication following minor revisions.
Figure 1: Changes made in response to the review posted on 14 April are a great improvement and help the reader much more clearer see the ash in 1A (previously 1D)
Figure 3: Is there a way to present this data so the reader can more clearly see the daily precipitation (mm) to drip rate relationships and responses? At the very least it could be helpful to plot precipitation and drip rate next to each other so it is easier for the reader to note the drip rate response to precipitation events (and how consistent this response is, which is interesting!)
Figure 4: Cleary state what the numbers in 4b represent. Would it be helpful to split 4b into two box and whisker plots, one for pre-fire interval and one for post-fire interval? Extra “a” in line 131 of the caption. **Edit: I see the updated Fig. 4 in the reply file PDF. Please clarify what the numbers in 4b are representing. Mean and median?
Figure 6: Explain more clearly what is being plotted here and why. It’s possible I’m missing something but I think the monthly data could be presented more clearly here.
Line 181: If you are using “BOM” throughout the text, define it in parentheses the first time it is used. Then used the abbreviation for the remainder of the text.
Lines 184-186: Expand the Fig. 7 caption to make it more clear that 7C and 7D are showing the same exact data, just grouped differently based on seasons
Discussion: I find that an expanded discussion section would greatly improve this manuscript. The current text is well-written and easy to follow (Fig. 8 is also very helpful) however I think there are many site-specific details and certain processes that require further discussion. Two specific points that come to mind:
- Lines 39-47 contain great background information on post-fire processes and how ash influences hydrology. It would be helpful to see these ideas presented in the introduction worked back into the discussion and related to what you see at Wildman’s Cave
- Bian et al. (2019) presents a wealth of geochemical data related to the same fire event discussed in this study. It could be helpful to link some of your interpretations related to ash and recharge back to the geochemical data presented in Bian et al. (2019). Do their trace element and stable isotope results support the model you present in Figure 8? A thorough discussion of this would be helpful.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-84-CC1
Data sets
Wildman's Cave drip hydrology 2014-2017 Andy Baker https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28169672.v1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
237 | 24 | 8 | 269 | 5 | 6 |
- HTML: 237
- PDF: 24
- XML: 8
- Total: 269
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 87 | 32 |
Australia | 2 | 46 | 17 |
Germany | 3 | 38 | 14 |
China | 4 | 11 | 4 |
France | 5 | 10 | 3 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 87