Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-734
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-734
27 Feb 2025
 | 27 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Investigating KDP signatures inside and below the dendritic growth layer with W-band Doppler Radar and in situ snowfall camera

Anton Kötsche, Alexander Myagkov, Leonie von Terzi, Maximilian Maahn, Veronika Ettrichrätz, Teresa Vogl, Alexander Ryzhkov, Petar Bukovcic, Davide Ori, and Heike Kalesse-Los

Abstract. Polarimetric radars provide variables like the specific differential phase (KDP) to detect fingerprints of dendritic growth in the dendritic growth layer (DGL) and secondary ice production, both critical for precipitation formation. A key challenge in interpreting radar observations is the lack of in situ validation of particle properties within the radar measurement volume. While high KDP in snow is usually associated with high particle number concentrations, only few studies attributed KDP to certain hydrometeor types and sizes. To address this, we combined surface in situ observations from the Video In Situ Snowfall Sensor (VISSS) with remote sensing data from a polarimetric W-band radar and an X-band radar, along with modeling approaches. Data was collected during the CORSIPP project, part of the ARM SAIL campaign (winter 2022/2023, Colorado Rocky Mountains). We found that at W-band, high KDP magnitudes can result from a broad range of particle number concentrations, between 1 and 100 l-1. Blowing snow and increased ice collisional fragmentation in a turbulent layer enhanced observed KDP values. T-matrix simulations indicated that high KDP values were primarily produced by particles smaller than 0.8 mm in the DGL and 1.2 mm near the surface. Discrete dipole approximation simulations based on VISSS data suggested that dendritic aggregates larger than 2.5 mm contributed 10–20 % to the measured W-band KDP near the surface. These findings highlight the complexity of interpreting W-band KDP in snowfall and emphasize the need for combined in situ observations and radar forward simulations to better understand snowfall microphysical processes.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Anton Kötsche, Alexander Myagkov, Leonie von Terzi, Maximilian Maahn, Veronika Ettrichrätz, Teresa Vogl, Alexander Ryzhkov, Petar Bukovcic, Davide Ori, and Heike Kalesse-Los

Status: open (until 10 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Anton Kötsche, Alexander Myagkov, Leonie von Terzi, Maximilian Maahn, Veronika Ettrichrätz, Teresa Vogl, Alexander Ryzhkov, Petar Bukovcic, Davide Ori, and Heike Kalesse-Los
Anton Kötsche, Alexander Myagkov, Leonie von Terzi, Maximilian Maahn, Veronika Ettrichrätz, Teresa Vogl, Alexander Ryzhkov, Petar Bukovcic, Davide Ori, and Heike Kalesse-Los

Viewed

Total article views: 116 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
95 16 5 116 4 3
  • HTML: 95
  • PDF: 16
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 116
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 118 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 118 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
Our study combines radar observations of snowf with snowfall camera observations on the ground to enhance our understanding of radar variables and snowfall properties. We found that values of an important radar variable (KDP) can be related to many different snow particle properties and number concentrations. We were able to constrain which particle sizes contribute to KDP by using computer models of snowflakes and showed which microphysical processes during snow formation can influence KDP.
Share