the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Empirical classification of dry-wet snow status in Antarctica using multi-frequency passive microwave observations
Abstract. Passive microwave satellite observations are commonly used to detect liquid water in the snowpack on the ice sheet. Typically, algorithms yield a binary dry-wet indicator limiting the information. Theoretical analyses have been demonstrated that these dry-wet indicators correspond to different levels in the snowpack depending on the frequency: from surface to ~0.2 m at 37 GHz, from surface to ~1 m at 19 GHz and from surface to depths exceeding 1 m at 1.4 GHz. In this study, our objective is to enhance understanding of melting and refreezing processes in Antarctica. For this, we proposed an empirical method that combines several binary dry-wet indicators computed at three frequencies (1.4, 19, and 37 GHz) and for two acquisition times (afternoon/night). We also introduced another indicator to estimate if most of the pixel (> 80 %) is subject to melt. By combining these six binary indicators, we obtained 64 possible daily ''dry-wet signatures'', which were interpreted to infer whether the snowpack was dry, actively melting, or only wet below the surface, if night refreezing was occurring, and if a large proportion of the pixel was impacted. 98 % of the examined pixels show a coherent and physically meaningful daily dry-wet signature across Antarctica during the 2012–2023 considered period. To synthesise the 64 dry-wet signatures, we grouped the signatures conveying similar information into 10 qualitative classes of ''snowpack status''. This new classification reveals a clear relationship between the various snowpack status and average surface temperature from ERA5 reanalysis, demonstrating the reliability of the empirical definition of the 10 classes. Furthermore, the classification captures the expected seasonal melt evolution: night refreezing is frequent at the beginning of the melt season, while sustained melting is observed in the middle of the summer, and remnant liquid water at depth features the end of the melt season. In the Antarctic Peninsula, over 11 years, we found an increasing trend in melting, significantly related to an increase in remnant liquid water at depth and a decrease in nighttime refreezing. This new classification offers deeper insights in melt processes for investigating extreme events and climate variations compared to previous binary indicators.
- Preprint
(6293 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-732', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 May 2025
The manuscript presents a multi-depth snowpack status classification scheme for Antarctica, utilizing multi-frequency spaceborne microwave radiometry. The paper is clearly written, and the subject matter aligns well with the scope and interests of the journal.
The use of the full spectrum of passive microwave radiometry for ice sheet melt detection is a relatively understudied area, which has fortunately begun to receive more attention in recent years. This study contributes meaningfully to that growing body of work.
While the approach may be seen as a preliminary or "low-hanging fruit" analysis, the authors' qualitative investigation of microwave signal behavior in relation to melt evolution represents an essential foundational step. This work is critical for advancing future research aimed at extracting more detailed and quantitative insights from remote sensing data.
I consider this paper a valuable contribution to the field and recommend it for publication following minor revisions:
Line 43: Please change “among” to “amount.”
Line 44: Add citations to relevant recent work, such as:
Naderpour et al. (2020)
Mousavi et al. (2022)
Hossan et al. (2024)
Moon et al. (2024)
Line 125: The choice to define the new melt season starting in mid-autumn is not intuitive. As Figure 5 suggests, late-season melt events may be incorrectly attributed to the following melt season. Please clarify the rationale or consider adjusting the definition.
Lines 139–140: Please cite additional supporting literature, such as:
Macelloni et al. (2011)
Montomoli et al. (2022)
Lines 179–180: This statement may oversimplify the L-band response. The response depends on the amount of active melting and liquid water accumulation. Please clarify this dependency here.
Line 197: Consider replacing “coherent” with “consistent” for improved clarity.
Line 235: Correct the grammar: “this possibilities” should be “these possibilities.”
Lines 297–298: Consider emphasizing the adequate accumulation of liquid water, rather than just the depth, as the key factor influencing the observed response.
References:
Hossan, A., Colliander, A., Vandecrux, B., Schlegel, N.-J., Harper, J., Marshall, S., & Miller, J. Z. (2024). Retrieval and Validation of Total Seasonal Liquid Water Amounts in the Percolation Zone of Greenland Ice Sheet Using L-band Radiometry. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2563
Macelloni, G., et al. (2011). Technical Support for the Deployment of an L-band Radiometer at Concordia Station During DOMEX-2 and Data Analysis. Final Report. Version 2.0. October 2011. European Space Agency Stify Contract Reports. https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/DOMEX-2-Final-Report.pdf
Moon, T., Harper, J., Colliander, A., Hossan, A., & Humphrey, N. (2024). L-Band Radiometric Measurement of Liquid Water in Greenland’s Firn: Comparative Analysis with In Situ Measurements and Modeling. California Digital Library (CDL). https://doi.org/10.31223/x56712
Montomoli, F., Brogioni, M., Macelloni, G., Leduc-Leballeur, M., Baldi, M., Martin-Neira, M., & Casal, T. G. D. (2022). Long Term L-Band Brightness Temperature of the DOMEX-3 Experiment: Improvement of Absolute Calibration and Data Analysis. IGARSS 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (pp. 7367–7370). https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss46834.2022.9883561
Mousavi, M., Colliander, A., Miller, J., & Kimball, J. S. (2022). A Novel Approach to Map the Intensity of Surface Melting on the Antarctica Ice Sheet Using SMAP L-Band Microwave Radiometry. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 15, 1724–1743. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2022.3147430
Naderpour, R., Houtz, D., & Schwank, M. (2020). Snow wetness retrieved from close-range L-band radiometry in the western Greenland ablation zone. Journal of Glaciology (Vol. 67, Issue 261, pp. 27–38). https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.79
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-732-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-732', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Jul 2025
This work proposes a novel synthesis of binary melt determinations from several different passive microwave sources, as well as accounting for varying diurnal observation timings, in order to assert features about the melt state of Antarctic firn. The authors propose a classification system to relate observations from 3 different satellites, and 6 different melt detection algorithms, into a set of categories for the spatial and diurnal variation of liquid water in a firn column. These classes go beyond what has previously been derived from passive microwave observation synthesis, and this work provides a valuable advance in passive microwave observation analysis of melt. This work provides a comparison with ERA5 reanalysis skin temperatures to give confidence that the durnality and spatial distribution of surface melt in this work at least generally reflects real world patterns, which is a reasonable approach for passive microwave melt analysis. Aside from several minor questions below, I believe that this work is suitable for publication in this journal.
My two biggest questions have to do with the new melt detection techniques presented in this work.
1) A new method for melt detection at 37 GHz is proposed here, and given its novelty I would like to see a little additional discussion about this method. In particular, I would like to see an explanation for the rationale of using a running mean of recent dry brightness temperature values and a 1-sigma increase to detect melt. Additionally, I am curious to see a short discussion of how well the method performs, or at least how well it agrees with other melt detection results.
2) A method for identifying if 80% of a 19 GHz pixel is melting is introduced. This method uses the difference between dry and wet snow brightness temperatures to produce a threshold value. I am curious, why did you use a single value for 19 GHz Tdry for all surfaces? I would expect the dry snow 19 GHz value to vary spatially as it is a function of temperature profile, grain size, and ice lenses in a snowpack.
A few specific comments by line:
Lines 141-142: You apply a bound of 20 to 35 K for the min and maximum threshold when applying the Torinesi method on 19V GHz data. How often are these bounds used? If they are required often, then how sensitive is the melt detection to those bounds?
Line 150: as with my previous comment, how often are these bounds used?
Lines 150-153: Just to be clear, does “filtered out” mean that these pixels are given no result for the year, or listed as no melt all year.
Lines 158-159: Is the M37 value calculated from the 5 most recent days that the snow was dry at 19 GHz? The text was unclear what the algorithm does if there are more than 5 days of 19 GHz melting.
Table 1: I am interested to see the occurrence rate of each of these classes or signatures listed somewhere, which could go in this table or Figure 1A in the appendix. Alternatively, in Figure 6 a second row could be added plotting the relative prevalence of each melt class by day of year.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-732-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
276 | 51 | 17 | 344 | 19 | 36 |
- HTML: 276
- PDF: 51
- XML: 17
- Total: 344
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 36
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1