Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-711
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-711
12 Mar 2025
 | 12 Mar 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

On the accuracy of the measured and modelled surface latent and sensible heat flux in the interior of the Greenland Ice Sheet

Ida Haven, Hans Christian Steen-Larsen, Laura J. Dietrich, Sonja Wahl, Jason E. Box, Michiel R. Van den Broeke, Alun Hubbard, Stephan T. Kral, Joachim Reuder, and Maurice Van Tiggelen

Abstract. The latent (LHF) and sensible (SHF) heat fluxes are key components of the surface mass and energy balance in the accumulation area of the Greenland Ice Sheet, making them critical for accurate sea level projections. While Eddy-Covariance(EC) systems provide accurate measurements of the turbulent surface transport of mass and energy in the low and mid-latitudes, frequent stable boundary layer conditions in polar regions introduce uncertainties in the EC method. In addition, as EC measurements are sparse, it is critical to characterise biases in the more common bulk fluxes obtained from automatic weather stations and climate models in polar areas. In this study, we present an intercomparison of three independent EC systems at the EastGRIP site at ∼2700 m a.s.l on the Greenland Ice Sheet to assess the accuracy of LHF and SHF measurements. A comparison of the fluxes by the three systems demonstrates excellent agreement, with a correlation (r) of 0.97 to 0.98, an absolute bias of 0.2 W m-2, an RMSE between 1.2 W m-2 and 1.5 W m-2 and slopes between 1.01 and 1.16 for the LHF, and r = 0.98, an absolute bias of less than 0.5 W m-2, an RMSE between 1.6 and 1.9 W m-2, and slopes of 1.0 for the SHF. A comparison of the validated EC fluxes against the bulk method highlights the sensitivity to the site-specific roughness length z0,m and the limitation of common parameterisations of the humidity and temperature roughness lengths z0,q and z0,t. Using improved values for z0,m, z0,q and z0,t, recomputed bulk fluxes are compared to fluxes simulated by regional climate models MAR, RACMO2.3p2 and RACMO2.4p1. We find an overall good agreement of the summer turbulent flux magnitudes, while all evaluated models simulate stronger near-surface temperature gradients during winter compared to observations from automatic weather stations, leading to consistently larger modelled SHF and LHF values in winter.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Ida Haven, Hans Christian Steen-Larsen, Laura J. Dietrich, Sonja Wahl, Jason E. Box, Michiel R. Van den Broeke, Alun Hubbard, Stephan T. Kral, Joachim Reuder, and Maurice Van Tiggelen

Status: open (until 23 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ida Haven, Hans Christian Steen-Larsen, Laura J. Dietrich, Sonja Wahl, Jason E. Box, Michiel R. Van den Broeke, Alun Hubbard, Stephan T. Kral, Joachim Reuder, and Maurice Van Tiggelen
Ida Haven, Hans Christian Steen-Larsen, Laura J. Dietrich, Sonja Wahl, Jason E. Box, Michiel R. Van den Broeke, Alun Hubbard, Stephan T. Kral, Joachim Reuder, and Maurice Van Tiggelen

Viewed

Total article views: 88 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
73 13 2 88 3 1 1
  • HTML: 73
  • PDF: 13
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 88
  • Supplement: 3
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 90 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 90 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
Three independent Eddy-Covariance measurement systems deployed on top of the Greenland Ice Sheet are compared. Using this dataset, we evaluate the reproducibility and quantify the differences between the systems. The fidelity of two regional climate models in capturing the seasonal variability in the latent and sensible heat flux between the snow surface and the atmosphere is assessed. We identify differences between observations and model simulations, especially during the winter period.
Share