the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Rate-induced tipping of ice sheets due to visco-elastic Earth response under idealized conditions
Abstract. The future evolution of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet may be characterized by self-reinforcing and irreversible retreat due to the unfolding of a marine ice sheet instability (MISI). How the stabilizing mechanism of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) does influence the timing and spatial extent of West Antarctica's present and potential future destabilization is highly uncertain and thus increasingly subject of numerical modeling studies that are based on observational data, striving for a most realistic representation of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Here we employ an ensemble of idealized simulations in a synthetic model setup to systematically investigate how the interaction between ice-sheet dynamics and the visco-elastic response of the solid Earth affect the tipping dynamics of an inherently buttressed, Antarctic-type ice-sheet-shelf system that is perturbed by basal ice-shelf melting. Exploring a wide range of solid Earth structures we find that the threshold of bifurcation-induced tipping (B-tipping), i.e., the critical meltrate magnitude inferred for the ice sheet in quasi equilibrium, strongly depends on the timescale and the spatial extent of the solid-Earth response. Compared to the case of a fixed bed (no bed deformation), the B-tipping threshold increases for the strongest (East-Antarctic type) Earth structures by at least 80 % (from 0.8 to 1.5 m yr−1) whereas for the weakest (West-Antarctic type) Earth structures the increase is more than one order of magnitude larger.
Due to the different timescales involved in the interplay between the dynamics of the ice sheet and the solid Earth, we find that for half of the ensemble members rate-induced tipping (R-tipping) occurs. That is, a sufficiently fast ramp-up of the basal meltrates triggers a MISI even before the critical forcing threshold of B-tipping would be crossed. In fact, due to R-tipping the effective critical tipping threshold reduces by up to 80 % for high upper-mantle viscosities and thin lithospheres. In none of our simulations bed uplift can stop a MISI once it is triggered, due to the very fast timescale of self-reinforcing grounding-line retreat. Furthermore, we highlight the occurrence of grounding-line overshoots and demonstrate cases of self-sustaining oscillations between advanced and collapsed ice-sheet states. Once triggered, these oscillations continue perpetually just due to the internal, non-linear interaction between ice-flow and solid-Earth dynamics. Our findings highlight that the character of the solid-Earth structure underlying a MISI-prone ice sheet can strongly affect its tipping dynamics mediated by the strength and timescale of the GIA feedback that counteracts MISI. In the context of Antarctic ice-sheet stability under global warming, our results particularly underscore that besides the magnitude also the rate of future anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are likely to play a crucial role.
- Preprint
(1995 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(6020 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5859', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Jan 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Johannes Feldmann, 27 Mar 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5859/egusphere-2025-5859-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Johannes Feldmann, 27 Mar 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5859', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Jan 2026
Dear authors,
Please, find attached my report.
All the best.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Johannes Feldmann, 27 Mar 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5859/egusphere-2025-5859-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Johannes Feldmann, 27 Mar 2026
-
EC1: 'Editor comment on egusphere-2025-5859', Florence Colleoni, 05 Feb 2026
Dear authors,
Both reviews have now being provided and after careful reading I will ask you to address most of the points asked by reviewers and perform additional simulations to strengthen the narrative of your study. Specifically:
- Both reviews question the role that Te has in the bed deformation and the fact that the consequences are opposite to what found so far in literature. I also support their point and would like you to move Figure S2 into the main text and provide a detailed explanation on what is observed in your simulation as it is critical to your conclusions
- The spin-up is very important: and though your approach is to start from the same initial grounding line position in all the runs, which is understandable to isolate the GIA processes from the drift du to model equilibrium, I also find very interesting to perform additional simulation without imposing a fixed non-deformable bed condition for the spin-up. This would definitely complement very well your current set of simulations. Besides as both reviewers note, the morphology of the bed is really critical to many aspect discuss in your study and we all know that GIA can modify the shape of the bed.
- Both reviewers also suggest a modification to Equation 2, which is also critical in assessing then the shift toward a rate-induce tipping, depending more on oceanic forcing but effectively pre-conditioned by GIA/bed morphology. Effectively, in its current form, Eq 2 cannot help isolate the impact of oceanic forcing versus Te alone. Thus this modification is important to really isolate the process especially, otherwise, it is difficult to disentangle the relative impact of one relative to the other. However, I also like the set of simulations performed with the original equations, which accounts for combined changes of oceanic forcing and GIA. Thus my suggestion is to redo the simulations with the modifications suggested by both reviewers, but nevertheless keep the current set of simulations as well.
- From reviewer 1: I would also like you to test the impact of higher frequency update of LC as for lower viscosity values, as the potential GIA response is quicker than with larger viscosity values.
- From reviewer 2: I recommend also to follow the advice about grid resolution for the discussion, as well as GIA domain extent. About other stabilizing feedbacks, this is true, atmospheric forcing also impact on the R-tipping, but this is not the object of this study. Thus, a paragraph in the discussion about this other external factor would be enough.
I would like to add that the overall manuscript is really interesting and that is why those changes are necessary. They allow you to really isolate the impact of GIA on changes in tipping dynamics of different ice stream-ice shelves systems in Antarctica. Because this approach is largely transferable to other sectors as well and might be of strong interest to a wide scientific community.
Florence Colleoni
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5859-EC1 -
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5859', Anonymous Referee #3, 13 Feb 2026
Please find the review in the attached pdf.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Johannes Feldmann, 27 Mar 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5859/egusphere-2025-5859-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Johannes Feldmann, 27 Mar 2026
Video supplement
Supplemental videos of the paper "Rate-induced tipping of ice sheets due to visco-elastic Earth response under idealized conditions" Johannes Feldmann https://doi.org/10.5446/s_1984
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 330 | 127 | 30 | 487 | 60 | 11 | 14 |
- HTML: 330
- PDF: 127
- XML: 30
- Total: 487
- Supplement: 60
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 14
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please find the comments in the attached pdf.