Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5803
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5803
04 Dec 2025
 | 04 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Sensitivity of cloud structure and precipitation to cloud microphysics schemes in ICON and implications for global km-scale simulations

Maor Sela, Philipp Weiss, and Philip Stier

Abstract. Cloud microphysics remains a major source of uncertainty in km-scale atmospheric models. While cloud-resolving models have advanced our understanding of cloud-climate interactions, their predictability remains limited. Most studies have examined either microphysics schemes or domain-size sensitivities, but their interactions are poorly understood. This study examines cloud structure and precipitation sensitivity to microphysics schemes and how they vary between regional and global configurations within a single, consistent modelling framework. We analyse three convection-permitting simulations over the Amazon: two regional runs employing single- and double-moment microphysics schemes and a global single-moment run, with all other configurations consistent. We find that cloud hydrometeor characteristics are sensitive to the microphysics scheme. Specifically, the double-moment scheme produces up to five times more graupel and 100 % more rainfall, but twice as much cloud water and five times as much fog as the single-moment scheme. Despite these variations, precipitation, water vapour, and outgoing longwave radiation remain consistent across schemes, suggesting large-scale constraints primarily govern integrated quantities. Furthermore, domain configuration amplifies sensitivities. The global simulation exhibits up to 150 % more fog and nearly double the cloud ice compared to the regional single-moment run, highlighting the role of large-scale circulation and lateral boundary conditions. These findings demonstrate that microphysics schemes influence cloud processes, while the domain setup determines how these sensitivities manifest. Improved observational constraints and perturbed-parameter ensembles are therefore needed to evaluate model performance and separate tuning effects and structural uncertainty.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Maor Sela, Philipp Weiss, and Philip Stier

Status: open (until 29 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Maor Sela, Philipp Weiss, and Philip Stier
Maor Sela, Philipp Weiss, and Philip Stier
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Clouds play a key role in Earth’s climate, but their representation in models remains uncertain. We use high-resolution simulations to examine how two statistical representations of cloud processes influence cloud and rain formation, and how these effects manifest in global models. We find that simulated clouds are highly sensitive to the chosen method, and that features such as rain, fog, and ice become even more variable at the global scale.
Share