Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5777
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5777
04 Dec 2025
 | 04 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Comparison of particle number concentrations measured with AQ Urban sensors in two different environments in Helsinki, Finland

Kimmo Teinilä, Teemu Lepistö, Jarkko V. Niemi, Harri Portin, Anssi Julkunen, Anu Kousa, Joel Kuula, Hanna E. Manninen, Pasi Aalto, Tuukka Petäjä, Topi Rönkkö, Erkka Saukko, and Hilkka Timonen

Abstract. The use of a diffusion charger based AQ Urban sensors to monitor particle number concentrations was investigated in Helsinki metropolitan area. The comparisons between the AQ Urban sensors and traditional butanol CPCs were made at a heavily trafficked street canyon (Traffic Supersite) and at an urban background site (UB Supersite) in 2022. The agreement with the measured particle number concentrations within different AQ Urban units was good. Comparison of the AQ Urban sensor with the two CPCs showed that AQ Urban sensors should be suitable to measure concentration of particles approx. larger than 10 nm in highly trafficked areas. The long-term agreement between AQ Urban sensors and CPCs was also investigated in the two different environments between January 1st and August 15th, 2022. Overall, the correlation between AQ Urban sensors and the CPCs was good at both sites (r being 0.93 and 0.89, respectively). The increased concentration of particles smaller than 10 nm and long-range transported pollution affected the accuracy of AQ Urban sensors. Despite this downside of the method, the correlation between the AQ Urban sensor and the CPCs was good during the whole measurement period, indicating that the sensor is well suitable for long-term particle number concentration monitoring in urban environments in Finland. However, the observed effect of bi-modal particle size distribution suggests that the performance of diffusion charger-based sensors may vary in different geographic regions depending on the regional background concentrations of accumulation mode particles which should be considered when applying the method in different locations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Kimmo Teinilä, Teemu Lepistö, Jarkko V. Niemi, Harri Portin, Anssi Julkunen, Anu Kousa, Joel Kuula, Hanna E. Manninen, Pasi Aalto, Tuukka Petäjä, Topi Rönkkö, Erkka Saukko, and Hilkka Timonen

Status: open (until 09 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Kimmo Teinilä, Teemu Lepistö, Jarkko V. Niemi, Harri Portin, Anssi Julkunen, Anu Kousa, Joel Kuula, Hanna E. Manninen, Pasi Aalto, Tuukka Petäjä, Topi Rönkkö, Erkka Saukko, and Hilkka Timonen
Kimmo Teinilä, Teemu Lepistö, Jarkko V. Niemi, Harri Portin, Anssi Julkunen, Anu Kousa, Joel Kuula, Hanna E. Manninen, Pasi Aalto, Tuukka Petäjä, Topi Rönkkö, Erkka Saukko, and Hilkka Timonen
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Particle number concentrations were measured with CPCs and AQ Urban sensors at two different urban environments in Helsinki in 2022. The measurement sites were traffic related and background urban sites. The aim of the study was to investigate suitability of using AQ Urban sensors in urban air quality monitoring to obtain particle number concentrations and challenges related to this.
Share