Spectral Analysis of Groundwater Level Time Series for Robust Estimation of Aquifer Response Times
Abstract. Groundwater resources represent Germany's most important source of freshwater but they are increasingly under pressure. Climate change, societal developments, and rising abstraction rates are impacting subsurface storage in ways that are currently difficult to predict, affecting both the quantity and quality of groundwater. To ensure sustainable groundwater management, it is crucial to evaluate the intrinsic and spatially variable vulnerability of groundwater systems, especially to prepare for the effects of hydrological extremes. In this context, the groundwater response time, defined as the timescale over which a groundwater system responds or adjusts to changes in external or internal conditions, serves as a valuable indicator for vulnerability assessments. Unlike traditional methods, we propose estimating response times through spectral analysis of groundwater level data. Time series from nearly 200 selected observation wells across Bavaria in Southern Germany were processed and transformed into the spectral domain. Corresponding recharge time series were extracted from high-resolution hydrological model outputs. By integrating these data with hydrogeomorphic information, we fitted a semi-analytical model to the groundwater level spectra to obtain aquifer response times. The semi-analytical solution for the spectral domain accurately reproduced the majority of observed groundwater level spectra. Most estimated response times fall between roughly 50 and 300 days. Significant correlation were found between the response time and the depth of the groundwater table. Groundwater systems exhibiting longer response times are interpreted as more resilient to drought conditions and therefore potentially better suited for groundwater abstraction than aquifers with shorter response times.
Summary
The manuscript by Houben et al presents a methodology that combines time series analysis, GIS and analytical modelling to estimate the average response time of aquifers in a large, regional data set of groundwater level time series from observation wells in the upper Danube river basin. The approach rests on existing findings by (i.a. Houben et al., 2022; Liang & Zhang; Zhang & Schilling, 2004) regarding temporal scaling of groundwater head and relation to aquifer geometry, properties and recharge. Here, the focus was on estimating at each location the characteristic time scale, a single value that quantifies the rate at which an aquifer responds to an external stress. This value is then briefly framed as a characteristic to quantify aquifer vulnerability to drought and criteria for selection of aquifers for abstraction. While the approach generally is sound, my primary concern with this paper is that the value of the analysis is not apparent when compared to other studies that require fewer data, assumptions, and less effort, such as the referenced study by Kumar et al. (2016) or Ebeling et al. (2025). What benefit does the characteristic time scale provide versus the current standard method in groundwater drought analysis using correlation times of SP(E)I vs SGI for example or e.g. cross-correlations (e.g., Bloomfield & Marchant, 2013; Ebeling et al., 2025)? I think the authors need to reflect on - and clarify this before the manuscript can be considered for publication. Below find specific comments:
Technical comments
References
Bloomfield, J. P., & Marchant, B. P. (2013). Analysis of groundwater drought building on the standardised precipitation index approach. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17(12), 4769-4787. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4769-2013
Changnon, S. A. (1987). Detecting drought conditions in Illinois. Circular no. 169.
Ebeling, P., Musolff, A., Kumar, R., Hartmann, A., & Fleckenstein, J. H. (2025). Groundwater head responses to droughts across Germany. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29(13), 2925-2950. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2925-2025
Houben, T., Pujades, E., Kalbacher, T., Dietrich, P., & Attinger, S. (2022). From Dynamic Groundwater Level Measurements to Regional Aquifer Parameters— Assessing the Power of Spectral Analysis. Water Resources Research, 58(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr031289
Kumar, R., Musuuza, J. L., Van Loon, A. F., Teuling, A. J., Barthel, R., Ten Broek, J., Mai, J., Samaniego, L., & Attinger, S. (2016). Multiscale evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index as a groundwater drought indicator. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20(3), 1117-1131. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1117-2016
Liang, X., & Zhang, Y.-K. (2013). Temporal and spatial variation and scaling of groundwater levels in a bounded unconfined aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 479, 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.044
Zhang, Y. K., & Schilling, K. (2004). Temporal scaling of hydraulic head and river base flow and its implication for groundwater recharge. Water Resources Research, 40(3), W035041-W035049.