Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5623
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5623
28 Nov 2025
 | 28 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Exploring new EarthCARE observations for evaluating Greenland clouds in RACMO2.4

Thirza N. Feenstra, Willem Jan van de Berg, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, David P. Donovan, Christiaan T. van Dalum, and Michiel R. van den Broeke

Abstract. Clouds present one of the major challenges for polar climate modeling and significantly contribute to uncertainties in climate and ice sheet mass balance projections, as their radiative effect can strongly impact ice and snow melt. Therefore, a reliable representation of clouds in polar climate models is essential, yet the observations necessary for their evaluation remain sparse. The launch of the Earth Cloud, Aerosol, and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) satellite in May 2024 helps bridge this gap by offering cloud observations in unprecedented detail using multiple instruments. Here, we demonstrate the potential of using these novel observations to evaluate cloud representation over the Greenland ice sheet in the regional climate model RACMO (version 2.4p1). To this end, we show along-track comparisons of co-located RACMO cloud profiles with EarthCARE lidar and radar observations. We compare both lidar backscatter and radar reflectivity observations, as well as retrieved cloud properties, with simulated RACMO profiles for two selected case studies. These first results indicate that RACMO simulates low- and mid-altitude ice clouds and snowfall at the correct locations, but fails to capture thinner high-altitude clouds. Additionally, RACMO typically underestimates cloud ice and snow water content, in particular in precipitating systems, where RACMO underestimates snowfall rates. Regarding supercooled liquid and mixed-phase clouds, RACMO does not always reproduce these, especially when they are located at higher altitudes. These first comparisons highlight the potential for using EarthCARE observations to evaluate regional climate models and provide directions for further development of RACMO.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors serves as editor for the special issue to which this paper belongs.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Thirza N. Feenstra, Willem Jan van de Berg, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, David P. Donovan, Christiaan T. van Dalum, and Michiel R. van den Broeke

Status: open (until 03 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Thirza N. Feenstra, Willem Jan van de Berg, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, David P. Donovan, Christiaan T. van Dalum, and Michiel R. van den Broeke

Data sets

Dataset for "Exploring new EarthCARE observations for evaluating Greenland clouds in RACMO2.4" Thirza Feenstra https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17590866

Model code and software

EarthCARE4RCM Thirza Feenstra https://github.com/thirza-feenstra/EarthCARE4RCM

Thirza N. Feenstra, Willem Jan van de Berg, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, David P. Donovan, Christiaan T. van Dalum, and Michiel R. van den Broeke
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 28 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Cloud representation brings large uncertainties in polar climate modeling. We show the first evaluation of Greenland clouds in the regional climate model RACMO2.4 using new EarthCARE satellite data. Comparing lidar and radar observations and retrieved cloud profiles with co-located RACMO output, we find RACMO captures lower ice clouds but underestimates thin high clouds, mid-altitude liquid clouds, and snowfall. These results highlight EarthCARE’s potential to improve polar climate models.
Share