Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5594
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5594
19 Nov 2025
 | 19 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Are ghost forests a substantial source of methane from reservoirs?

Johannes Dittmann, Damien T. Maher, Scott G. Johnston, Douglas R. Tait, Paula Gomez Alvarez, Alistar Grinham, Katrin Sturm, and Luke C. Jeffrey

Abstract. Methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas that is increasing in the atmosphere, being a major driver of climate change. Tree stem CH4 emissions are a rapidly advancing research field however emissions from dead trees remain poorly studied. This is of particular concern in reservoir "ghost forests", where large areas of standing dead trees can form, and remain submerged in CH4-enriched waters, providing a potential CH4-flux pathway along the soil-tree-atmosphere continuum, for many decades. This study quantified the drivers of seasonal CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from a ghost forest within a subtropical reservoir alongside diffusive and ebullition fluxes, across two seasons. We compared the influence of sediment organic carbon, water level and temperature fluctuations on ghost forest stem CH4 emissions, to the diffusive and ebullition flux pathways, at three within reservoir sites (North, Mid and South). The highest average ghost forest CH4 fluxes occurred near the reservoir inflow site (South) during summer (1173 ± 338 µmol m-2 stem d-1). At the same location the average CH4 fluxes from ghost forest trees and ebullition were significantly higher, 5.8 and 2.7 respectfully, during summer, compared to winter. Ghost forest CH4 fluxes contributed an additional ~15 % to the overall reservoir greenhouse gas budget, beyond conventional methods which generally only consider ebullition and diffusive flux pathways. Our findings reveal the need to recognise ghost forest CH4 emissions from reservoirs and encourage management strategies to balance CH4 mitigation with other ecological benefits of standing ghost forests.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Johannes Dittmann, Damien T. Maher, Scott G. Johnston, Douglas R. Tait, Paula Gomez Alvarez, Alistar Grinham, Katrin Sturm, and Luke C. Jeffrey

Status: open (until 31 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Johannes Dittmann, Damien T. Maher, Scott G. Johnston, Douglas R. Tait, Paula Gomez Alvarez, Alistar Grinham, Katrin Sturm, and Luke C. Jeffrey
Johannes Dittmann, Damien T. Maher, Scott G. Johnston, Douglas R. Tait, Paula Gomez Alvarez, Alistar Grinham, Katrin Sturm, and Luke C. Jeffrey

Viewed

Total article views: 54 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
49 4 1 54 3 1 1
  • HTML: 49
  • PDF: 4
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 54
  • Supplement: 3
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 54 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 54 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Reservoir dead trees (‘ghost forests’) are an overlooked methane (CH4) source in standing freshwaters. We measured CH4 fluxes from 34 trees at multiple stem heights, alongside aquatic CH4 fluxes and physicochemistry, across two field campaigns. Ghost forest CH4 fluxes were highest near reservoir inflows, with tree CH4 contributing extra emissions of 14–15 % on top of the commonly quantified pathways of ebullition and diffusion.
Share