Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5567
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5567
19 Nov 2025
 | 19 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Quantification, spatial distribution and persistence of root-derived carbon for 12 cover crops

Baptiste Hulin, Florent Massol, Simon Chollet, Francis Dohou, Stéphane Paolillo, and Samuel Abiven

Abstract. Organic carbon derived from roots is a major input fuelling soil organic carbon stocks, especially in agricultural systems, where aboveground biomass might be harvested. However, root sampling for carbon monitoring excludes net rhizodeposition, i.e. the organic compounds released by the roots that have not been rapidly mineralised, and some of the finest root debris, because this fraction of root-derived carbon can not be directly quantified in the field. To compensate for this shortfall, we set up a two-month experiment with multi-pulse 13C-CO2 labellings of 12 crops to quantify these carbon pools at harvest, operationally grouped under the term SOCnew. We also investigated the spatial distribution of belowground carbon inputs within the soil profile. Lastly, in order to follow the fate of this carbon after the plant death, we performed a 524-day litterbag incubation in the field using the labelled material. We found that SOCnew accounted for 27 % of belowground carbon inputs at harvest. It was not correlated to carbon amounts of the shoots, but was positively correlated to root carbon (R2 = 0.14). The vertical distribution of SOCnew tended to follow the one of roots. The majority was recovered in the bulk soil, rather than adhering to the roots. We showed that SOCnew had a greater persistence time in the soils than roots in the mid-term. However, these findings were marked by high variability because the small quantities of carbon involved make it difficult to assess persistence by isotopic difference. These results suggest that net rhizodeposition and fine root debris should be taken into account in organic carbon management of soils as it refines our estimation of belowground inputs. However, their low predictability, due to the diversity of products and processes, is still a barrier.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Baptiste Hulin, Florent Massol, Simon Chollet, Francis Dohou, Stéphane Paolillo, and Samuel Abiven

Status: open (until 31 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Baptiste Hulin, Florent Massol, Simon Chollet, Francis Dohou, Stéphane Paolillo, and Samuel Abiven

Data sets

Dataset of a multi-pulse labelling experiment with 13C CO2 to trace root-derived carbon in the soil. Baptiste Hulin, Simon Chollet, Florent Massol, Samuel Abiven https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17482237

Baptiste Hulin, Florent Massol, Simon Chollet, Francis Dohou, Stéphane Paolillo, and Samuel Abiven

Viewed

Total article views: 106 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
91 7 8 106 15 6 5
  • HTML: 91
  • PDF: 7
  • XML: 8
  • Total: 106
  • Supplement: 15
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 106 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 106 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Root-derived carbon is a major input fuelling soil organic carbon stock. However, root sampling generally omits a considerable fraction of this input. Here, we used isotopic tracing, performed on 12 crops, to quantify this carbon pool and to evaluate its persistence through an 18-month field incubation experiment. We highlighted that it represents a large share of root-derived carbon (27 %) with differences between plant families, and that its persistence in the soil might exceed that of roots.
Share