Technical note: Obtaining accurate, high-frequency and long-term seawater pH data by using coupled lab-on-chip and optode sensing technologies
Abstract. The marine science community requires accurate, cost-effective, and reliable pH sensors capable of long-term, stable operations in-situ from coastal to deep-sea environments. Spectrophotometric pH sensors based on lab-on-chip (LOC) technology have been shown to offer long-term accuracy that can sample every 10 minutes. However, for applications where higher-frequency measurements are important, this maximum sample rate may be limiting, in addition to the power requirements needed to operate the sensor.
In contrast, commercially available pH optodes (PyroScience GmbH) are relatively inexpensive, consume little power and have a small form factor, but with intense use the pH sensitive membrane can photo-oxidise, causing signal drift. The combination of LOC and optode technologies, however, can be used to provide long-term, high-frequency and high-stability in-situ pH data, but protocols to correct for sensor drift need to be developed and evaluated.
To examine sensor drift and develop protocols to account for it, we suspended two LOC pH sensors with two pH optodes at 0.5 m depth from a floating pontoon within a harbour in Southampton, UK for six months (June–December 2023). This is a highly dynamic tidal environment with substantial biofouling. The optode (AquapHOx-L-pH, PyroScience GmbH) and an independent pH sensor (Deep SeapHOx V2, Sea-Bird Scientific) measured at a high frequency (e.g., ≤5 min) alongside a LOC pH sensor measuring at a lower frequency (e.g., ≤2 hr). Triplicate lab validated co-samples were collected each week, in addition to dedicated sensors monitoring the temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and tidal height. We find good agreement i.e., mean ∆pH = -0.022 ± 0.023 (3,182 data points in common) pH units between the SeapHOx and LOC sensors, in addition to individual field accuracies of <0.020 pH units. As expected, we found significant signal drift (e.g., generally ≤0.012 pH units per day) and offsets (e.g., 0.1–0.2 pH units) with the pH optodes after intensive use in a high biofouling environment. However, by coupling accurate LOC pH data to high frequency optode data, we corrected the optode signal drift/offset and achieved a similar field accuracy (<0.02 pH units) to the SeapHOx sensor even when using ultra-low LOC pH sensor measurement frequencies (e.g., several days to weeks). Overall, this work provides the oceanographic community with guidelines on how to achieve accurate, rapid and long-term pH measurements, while also balancing power requirements, by combining two complementary pH sensing technologies.
Here the authors present data from two deployments of pH sensors that operate at different frequencies. By deploying a pH optode alongside their LOC (lab on chip) pH sensor, they were able to demonstrate that the greater accuracy provided by the LOC pH measurement could be used to correct drift in the pH optode signal. This opened up the ability to measure pH at far greater frequency by the LOC sensor alone for longer duration using the higher frequency optode that is prone to more rapid drift. An ISFET-based pH sensor package was deployed alongside as well to provide an independent indication of optode performance and assessment of the LOC applied correction in addition to bottle samples. As part of the study, it was also determined how often the optode benefitted from the correction by the LOC sensor.
A few comments:
Line 74: ISFET-based pH warmup time depends on choice of reference electrode. If using the Cl- ISE, there is a longer conditioning requirement.
Table 1 (and text above): Size of sensors is a little unusual to include without more details- why list the size of the seafet if you deployed a seaphox? Is this just the sensor or the electronics, housing, power, etc.? Sensor footprint is different from a fully autonomous package.
Line 159: I don’t recall mention of pH scales used. It is important when comparing different sensors to describe which scale is being used and where/how conversions are being applied. What is the composition of the pyroscience calibration solutions?
General: