the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
From Soil to Stream: Modeling the Catchment-Scale Hydrological Effects of Increased Soil Organic Carbon
Abstract. Droughts are increasingly threatening agricultural productivity. One potential adaptation is to increase the soil water retention capacity, which can be achieved by enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) through agricultural management. We investigated how increasing SOC affects catchment-scale hydrology including extremes. SOC increases were implemented via adjustments to soil hydraulic parameters (ρb, θPWP, θFC, θSat, Ksat) in a mesoscale hydrologic modeling (mHM) framework, following literature-reported effects. Our analysis focuses on the medium-sized, agriculturally dominated Broye catchment in Western Switzerland, wherein we evaluated five SOC increase scenarios of varying depth and magnitude. At the plot scale, SOC increases resulted in higher net soil water content (2.99–8.13 %) and slightly higher evapotranspiration (0.15–0.4 %), while subsurface runoff was reduced (0.28–0.72 % across all scenarios). These values represent overall net changes; while at shorter timescales, the magnitude and even direction of effects varied by season and location. Increased water retention meant more soil water was retained and latter evaporated and less was available for groundwater recharge and eventually as streamflow. At the catchment scale, streamflows were slightly reduced, with peak flows modestly attenuated. Low flow responses depended on catchment characteristics and timing. In warmer and drier subcatchments, low flow frequency increased in some years, whereas in cooler and wetter subcatchments, conditions in spring and early summer produced a beneficial effect, slightly reducing low flow frequency. Overall our analysis suggest that a large-scale increase in SOC, while benefiting agricultural productivity and peak flow attenuation, may also induce trade-offs by potentially reducing groundwater recharge and downstream water availability.
Competing interests: Rohini Kumar is editor of this journal.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(11068 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3371 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 07 Jan 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5447', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Dec 2025 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5447', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Jan 2026
reply
The study overall focuses on the modelling of the effects of soil organic carbon at a catchment analysing its’ drainage status from the soil to the stream itself. For this, the researchers studied the increment influences of the SOC on that specific catchment stream. They also analysed extreme scenarios of SOC enhancement via agricultural applications. Their results were reasonable and compatible with the related known scientific literature. These results state considerable means for the regions which actually or potentially face flood and drought risks. However, the manuscript needs some revisions in order to be relatively well-understood and expressed overall.
Abstract
Lines 3: Please correct the sentence as “We investigated how increasing SOC affected catchment-scale hydrology including extremes.”
Line 7: Correct as “At the plot scale, increment of SOC resulted in higher net soil water content (2.99–8.13%) and in slightly higher evapotranspiration (0.15–0.4%),….”
Lines 15: “Overall our analysis suggest that a large-scale increase in SOC, while benefiting agricultural productivity and peak flow attenuation, may also induce trade-offs by potentially reducing groundwater recharge and downstream water.”
Since this is the significant conclusion of abstract; try to rewrite the sentence though it this form it is ambiguous.
Keywords: “SOC enhancement; Broye catchment, Western Switzerland”
Introduction
The sequence of the “Introduction” does not directly comply with the core aim of this study.
In fact, it focuses mainly on the agriculture and effects rather than the modelling targets. Please try to adapt and connect SOC and modelling procedures.
Also, it involves general explanations such as “However, irrigation increasingly competes with ecological needs and other sectors (Brunner et al., 2019).”
Line 21: Order of the references must follow the chronology.; E.g. ; Tijdeman et al., 2022; Hou et al., 2024
Line 30: “When precipitation and soil moisture deficits coincide with high air temperatures and high evaporative demand, plants close their stomata to limit water loss (Gupta et al., 2020).”
What does this sentence intend to mean?
Line 50: Check the order of the references’ chronology.
Also try to revise English.
Methods
Line: 108: “A range of management practices are reported that increase SOC:”
What do you mean?
Line 230: Here the study area is not well-defined; we learn only its size. The following expressions are time inputs etc.
Line 267: “(following Jarvis (1989) as implemented and documented by Demirel et al. (2018))”?
Results and Discussion
The other catchments are included here. However, they are not mentioned at the “Abstact”.
In the Figure 6, the scenario should be plural: “scenarios”.
Conclusion
Discuss also the performance of the model particularly for this study and catchment.
References
Check the references. Exp.:
“Fry, E. L., Evans, A. L., Sturrock, C. J., Bullock, J. M., and Bardgett, R. D.: Root architecture governs plasticity in response to drought, Plant Soil, 433, 189–200, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3824-1, fry, Ellen L Evans, Amy L Sturrock, Craig J Bullock, James M Bardgett, Richard D eng Netherlands 2018/01/01 Plant Soil. 2018;433(1):189-200. doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3824-1. Epub 2018 Oct 25., 2018.”
I think wrong-written. Or automatically referencing procedure was wrong-applied. Check the others.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5447-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 183 | 64 | 14 | 261 | 25 | 27 | 22 |
- HTML: 183
- PDF: 64
- XML: 14
- Total: 261
- Supplement: 25
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 22
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please see my comments attached.