the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Growth and decay of the Iceland Ice Sheet through the last glacial cycle
Abstract. Constraining the dynamic evolution of past ice sheets is critical for unravelling their responses to external forcing and feedbacks over long timescales. This is particularly true in the context of marine ice sheet collapse, as this is one of the largest sources of uncertainty for future sea-level rise projections. The Iceland Ice Sheet (IIS) provides an empirically constrained case study for investigating such an instability, having retreated from a predominantly marine-based ice sheet to isolated mountain ice caps during the last deglaciation. However, previous reconstructions of the IIS have been limited by either sparse data or a restricted exploration of model parameter space, lacking a robust quantification of uncertainties. Here, we address this gap by performing a truncated history matching of the last glacial cycle of the IIS. We use the Glacial Systems Model (GSM) constrained by a curated set of geochronological data to generate an envelope of plausible ice sheet histories.
Our results indicate that numerous asynchronous ice streams effectively drain ice from the interior to the margins, resulting in an extensive yet relatively thin ice sheet. During its local Last Glacial Maximum (23.6–20.9 ka), the IIS reaches the continental shelf edge in most sectors with a total volume of 0.41 to 0.76 metres equivalent sea level (m e.s.l.). In the most extreme, yet plausible, glaciation scenarios, our model reveals an ice bridge connecting the Iceland and Greenland ice over the Denmark Strait.
We find that accelerated ice discharge (at the grounding line) dominates mass loss during deglaciation. This acceleration is primarily driven by atmospheric warming through a cascade of mechanisms: surface meltwater induces hydrofracturing, leading to ice shelf disintegration, which in turn reduces buttressing and triggers rapid ice stream acceleration. The critical role of hydrofracturing in enabling model capture of deglacial data constraints is shown by an explicit sensitivity experiment. This thereby supports inclusion of hydrofracturing for modelling of ongoing ice sheet response to climate change.
Competing interests: One author (Lev Tarasov) is a member of the editorial board of Climate of the Past. The authors declare that they otherwise have no conflict of interest.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(21167 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(20 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5319', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Dec 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alexis Goffin, 27 Jan 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5319', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Feb 2026
Overall comments
An overall well-written and interesting manuscript on an important aspect of ice-shelf hydrofracturing and its impact on ice decay, but several aspects listed beloww would benefit from clarification and expansion to strengthen the interpretation of the results presented in the current version. Presentation of results (i.e., figures) could also be enhanced to support the key points.
Ice dynamics, deglaciation drivers, and isostacy
The statement “We then disentangle the drivers and controls of its subsequent deglaciation” would benefit from a broader discussion of glacial isostatic adjustment. In particular, consideration of its sensitivity to heterogeneous mantle viscosity and the resultant impact on regional sea level would strengthen the interpretation of deglaciation processes, as well as their rates. Then , the discussion of ice stream behaviour could be expanded. In the statement “Most of these ice streams activate and deactivate independently…”, basal velocities periodically drop to zero, implying complete shutdowns. How is subglacial meltwater involved in these shutdowns? A more detailed discussion of basal melting, geothermal heat flux, and meltwater production would be useful here.
Representation of hydrofracturing and ice shelves
The paper would benefit from a clearer discussion of the limitations associated with representing hydrofracturing at a 5° (~7 × 6 km) grid resolution. How well can hydrofracturing processes be captured at this scale? Furthermore, ice shelves appear to occupy relatively limited areas in the northern sector (Fig. 8), whereas southern part lacks floating ice. Quantification of ice-shelf area relative to the total ice-sheet area would be helpful as this is central part of the study and heterogeneous variability would add nuance to the results. In addition, further discussion is needed on how much hydrofracturing occurs in the southern ice-sheet sector and how this compares with the north.
Geological constraints and model–data comparison
I think that perhaps a more explicit figure showing empirically reconstructed ice margins, including dating uncertainties, is needed to allow a clearer visual comparison between geological reconstructions and the model runs. Finally, heat-flux reconstructions and borehole locations from Flóvenz and Sæmundsson (1993) and Hjartarson (2015) should be shown on one of the maps to better contextualise the geothermal forcing used in the model.
Minor comments
Line 20: Robel et al. (2019) is cited twice.
Line 270: Section heading “3.2.1 pre-LGM” should be capitalised.
Figure 7: Ensure that minimum and maximum extent labels are clearly identified and, if possible, differentiated by colour.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5319-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alexis Goffin, 10 Mar 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 625 | 904 | 41 | 1,570 | 38 | 41 | 41 |
- HTML: 625
- PDF: 904
- XML: 41
- Total: 1,570
- Supplement: 38
- BibTeX: 41
- EndNote: 41
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This is a well written and timely paper that uses numerical modelling constrained by palaeo-glaciological and geochronological data to produce a set of ice sheet histories for the Icelandic Ice Sheet through the last glacial cycle. I think the subject of the paper is suitable for Climate of the Past and could be published subject to some minor-moderate revision that address the following points: