Rapid formation of secondary aerosol precursors from the autoxidation of C5–C8 n-aldehydes
Abstract. Long chain aldehydes are common atmospheric constituents, and their gas-phase oxidation form low volatility condensable products leading to secondary organic aerosol. Although the oxidation of n-aldehydes initiated by OH radicals is dominated by aldehydic hydrogen abstraction, the non-aldehydic hydrogen abstractions tend to become competitive with the increase of aldehyde carbon chain length. Here, we experimentally investigated the oxidation of C5–C8 n-aldehydes in variable reaction times (1–13 s) in a flow tube reactor coupled to a nitrate ion time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer (NO3–-ToF-CIMS). Octanal produced highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs – low volatility products) with up to 7 O atoms within 1.0 s while the same level of oxygenation was acquired by pentanal within 2.3 s. In long reaction time (11–13 s) experiments, we observed HOMs with progressively more O atoms and higher intensity product signals with the increase of carbon atoms in the precursor aldehydes. Our experiments in the presence of high NO concentrations (2 ppb to 1 ppm) showed the formation of prominent highly oxygenated organonitrates along with the suppression of HOM accretion products. However, some enhancement in the monomeric HOMs even with 6 O atoms were seen under variable NO conditions. Results from hydrogen to deuterium (H/D) exchange experiments showed that the studied n-aldehydes undergo similar autoxidation mechanisms, but the reactivity and HOM formation potential increase with increasing carbon chain length.
This paper reports the results of a thorough and carefully conducted experimental study of the formation of secondary aerosol precursors from the autooxidation of several long chain aldehydes. The topic is of current research interest to the atmospheric chemistry community. The results are presented clearly and concisely. The conclusions are well supported by the results. I recommend publication as is.
I noticed a couple of typos:
(1) On line 121, “we conducted the reactions at variable reaction times” might read better as “we studied the reactions over a range of reaction times”.
(2) Calvert et al. "(2020)" should be “Calvert et al. (2011)” throughout.