Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5107
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5107
21 Nov 2025
 | 21 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Improvement of Soil Properties Maps using an Iterative Residual Correction Method

Chengcheng Xu, Elia Scudiero, Ray Anderson, and Nathaniel Chaney

Abstract. Accurate mapping of soil properties is vital for many applications including precision irrigation and fertilization.  However, existing models for digital soil maps underestimate their spatial variability or prediction uncertainties, which introduces risk for applications including agricultural irrigation and fertilization. This study introduces a hybrid approach that combines prior soil predictions with iterative residual correction to improve soil mapping performance using a Californian case study to demonstrate its application. We first generate prior probabilistic soil property maps using a pruned hierarchical Random Forest (pHRF) method. These prior estimates are then refined by integrating additional soil profile data and iteratively adjusting residuals of distribution of soil properties (differences between observation and prior predictions) pixel by pixel. It gradually adjusts the statistical shape of soil property distributions and incrementally corrects bias of prior knowledge with observed soil information. We evaluated soil mapping over California and at 1-km resolution to test the methodology. For residual correction, we compiled laboratory-measured soil profile data from three primary sources: the World Soil Information Service (WoSIS), the National Soil Characterization Database (SCD), and field measurements conducted by the University of California, Riverside (UCR) and the USDA-ARS United States Salinity Laboratory. From the evaluations, the posterior soil texture predictions show an RMSE of less than 10 %, a 7 % reduction compared to the priors (pHRF-derived soil maps). For soil organic matter (SOM) and oven-dry bulk density (BD), the RMSE also decreased, as the priors initially underestimated their spatial variation. Although posterior SOM and BD predictions were less accurate than other soil properties, this was expected since they are dynamic soil properties and their response to environment and anthropogenic activities is more difficult to simulate. The residual correction also showed reduced uncertainties, as demonstrated by narrower prediction intervals compared to the priors. This method also applied optimization with physical constraints, such as ensuring the bounds of soil property values. This study presents a two-step framework that improves accuracy and reduces uncertainty for DSM applications.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Chengcheng Xu, Elia Scudiero, Ray Anderson, and Nathaniel Chaney

Status: open (until 02 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Chengcheng Xu, Elia Scudiero, Ray Anderson, and Nathaniel Chaney
Chengcheng Xu, Elia Scudiero, Ray Anderson, and Nathaniel Chaney

Viewed

Total article views: 45 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
32 8 5 45 3 3
  • HTML: 32
  • PDF: 8
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 45
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 45 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 45 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Accurate soil information is important. This study developed a new method that improves existing soil maps by correcting their probability distributions using newly collected soil measurements. By repeatedly adjusting previous predictions, the method makes soil maps more accurate and more certain. The application in California improved the performance of predictions for soil texture, organic matter, and bulk density. This method can be further used for other soil properties and regions.
Share